POLITICAL NEWS
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] POLITICAL NEWS

1,627 Posts
16 Users
4486 Reactions
149.9 K Views
Patricia N.
Posts: 7277
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Trump: I Will Start Pardoning January 6 Rioters My First Day in Office:

President-elect Donald Trump said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that he was planning to pardon those involved in the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 as soon as his first day in office.

Host Kristen Welker said, “I asked the President-elect if he plans to follow through on his campaign promise to pardon those who attacked the Capitol on January 6, including the more than 900 people who pleaded guilty to a crime.”

Trump said, “I’m going to look at everything. We’ll look at individual cases. But I’m going to be acting very quickly.”

Welker said, “Within your first 100 days, first day?”

Trump said, “First day.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/12/08/trump-i-will-start-pardoning-january-6-rioters-my-first-day-in-office/


Patricia N.
Posts: 7277
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 7 years ago

REPORT: Evidence Suggests FDR Let Pearl Harbor Happen to Force America into WWII:

83 years ago yesterday, America was brought into war with what was described then, and has been described consistently since, as a “sneak attack” by Imperial Japan.

Then-President Franklin Roosevelt gave a speech on December 8th before Congress where he described it as a “Day of Infamy” where America was suddenly and deliberately attacked.

What Roosevelt failed to mention is that he knew the attack was going to happen, the government had received copious warnings about what was going to happen, and those warnings were not only ignored but steps were taken to facilitate the Japanese attack.

A series of events and factual matters strongly suggest that Roosevelt not only wanted war, but employed his top officials to help him in that effort.
[Lots of information in this article in case you have not heard of this previously.]
 

Terry
Posts: 1385
Registered
(@terry)
Famed Member
Joined: 3 years ago

Everybody's known about Roosevelt's murderous trickery for years.  I wonder why a splash is being made about it now.  Is something else afoot?


1 Reply
Patricia N.
Registered
(@patrician)
Joined: 7 years ago

Illustrious Member
Posts: 7277

@terry 

I bet there are lots of people who don't know about it, or else they think it's a conspiracy theory.  Anyway, there wasn't a mention of Pearl Harbor on December 7th on any other news that I watched or read.  I thought that was odd.


Terry
Posts: 1385
Registered
(@terry)
Famed Member
Joined: 3 years ago

I neglected to mention, interesting reading anyway; thanks.


Patricia N.
Posts: 7277
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Mike Lee catches NBC News omitting words from Constitution — then he reveals why NBC anchor didn't want you to hear them:

Speaking with President-elect Donald Trump about his plan to end birthright citizenship — which grants United States citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil — Welker tried to suggest the plan is unconstitutional by citing the first sentence of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.

After Trump confirmed that ending birthright citizenship is "absolutely" his plan, Welker said, "The 14th Amendment, though, says that, quote, 'All persons born in the United States are citizens.'"

But there is a significant problem with Welker's quote, according to Lee.

In fact, Welker omitted six words from the first sentence of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment — and those "words matter," Lee explained.

Here is what the beginning of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment actually says:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

This means that Welker omitted the phrase, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," to create the illusion that Trump would be acting unconstitutionally if he sought to outlaw birthright citizenship.

But according to Lee, that critical phrase empowers Congress to define what it means, and, therefore, to regulate birthright citizenship.

"Congress has the power to define what it means to be born in the United States 'and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,'" Lee explained. "While current law contains no such restriction, Congress could pass a law defining what it means to be born in the United States 'and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,' excluding prospectively from birthright citizenship individuals born in the U.S. to illegal aliens."

Importantly, Lee pointed out that Congress has attempted to regulate birthright citizenship in the past.

In 1993, for example, then-Sen. Harry Reid (D) proposed legislation that would have limited birthright citizenship to children whose mothers are either U.S. citizens or permanent legal residents. Ultimately, the bill did not become law. But, Lee said, it demonstrates that Congress is well aware of its ability to regulate birthright citizenship.

In the end, Lee condemned NBC and Welker for "one-sided" coverage, explaining why he believes Welker omitted that key provision from the 14th Amendment.

"[Meet the Press] seems to try to render a debatable matter beyond debate by selectively omitting key words from the Constitution, making it appear incorrectly that the Fourteenth Amendment proscribes any and all restrictions on birthright citizenship," Lee said.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/mike-lee-nbc-constitution-birthright-citizenship   


Page 129 / 277
Share: