Still pondering the sinister “wish” for the Aussies to push the vax on people’s pets. When Dodger as sick and the vet hospital failed to find what was wrong and when I was making an appointment with his local vet to be seen I said to the appointment scheduler … could he have covid?? She laughed and said no … it’s impossible for dogs and cats to get covid. So if that is the case … why is the Australians pushing this? Could it be to disarm their people even more since pets, especially dogs, will protect their owner against evil people who try to harm them or try to arrest them or take them to a covid camp? I “think” this just proves these evil leaders wish we were gone as well as our pets and the Lord is going to give them their wish by snatching both us and our fur babies out of here SOON! Hosea 4:3 “Therefore shall the land mourn, and every one that dwelleth therein shall languish, with the beasts of the field, and with the fowls of heaven; yea, the fishes of the sea also shall be taken away.” It could be that people are so calloused these days that they don't bat an eye when 85 year old grannie dies. However, if cute little Fido were to die? It could be a way to bring animal lovers/couples with no children but have pets on board with overthrowing the old world order if they see their pets die a horrible death. They want us to rebel and they don't care if they have to sacrifice a huge number of innocent animals/babies/children/people to do it. The CDC thinks covid is transmissible by animals though they think the likelihood is low: Per the CDC: What You Need to Know Risk of animals spreading SARS-CoV-2 to people Some coronaviruses that infect animals can be spread to people and then spread between people, but this is rare. This is what happened with SARS-CoV-2, which likely originated in bats. Risk of people spreading SARS-CoV-2 to animals Companion animals, including pet cats, dogs, and ferrets. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/animals.html FAIR USE Preying on the emotional attachment of pets they hope to entice owners to get vaxxed as well! TR We are watching you ... hmm.... Fair use for educational purposes: COMMENTARY BY This week, we revealed that an obscure federal agency plans to keep lists of the “personal religious information” employees who had religious objections to the federal employee vaccine mandate. As it turns out, the little-known Pre-trial Services Agency for the District of Columbia isn’t the only federal agency involved. As we feared, a whole-of-government effort looks to be underway. A little digging at the Federal Register revealed that there are at least 19 total federal agencies—including five cabinet level agencies—that have created or proposed to create these tracking lists for religious-exemption requests from their employees. The list includes the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of the Treasury, to name only a few. As the nation’s largest employer, with over four million civilian and military employees, the federal government has received tens of thousands of religious exemption requests. It now appears that an increasing number of federal agencies are keeping and preserving those individuals’ names, religious information, personally identifying information, and other data stored in lists across multiple government agencies. Why? The earliest set of proposals appears to have been rolled out in October of last year, during the start of the holiday season in a possible effort to ensure very little attention was paid to a coordinated data collection move. Many of the announcements have clocked only a few page views. Almost none attracted any public comments. Most permitted only a 30-day window for submitting objections. All announcements were issued within a few weeks of one another. The timing alone raises questions. The Pre-trial Services Agency in D.C. was only the most recent iteration of a disturbing trend—the Biden administration is creating lists that can all communicate with one another on which individuals have sought religious exemptions from the federal employee vaccine mandate or other religious accommodations within the scope of their employment by the government. Several of the notices, but not all, indicate that they are being issued to implement Biden’s COVID-19 executive order on federal government employees. The rest have proffered the Privacy Act of 1974—which establishes a code of information practices that governs the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of information about individuals stored by federal agencies—as their justification for the creation of a new list. The agencies plan to collect religious affiliation, the reasons and support given for religious accommodation requests, names, contact information, date of birth, aliases, home address, contact information, and other identifying information. These lists will be shared between federal agencies. The notices do not explain how long they plan on storing this data, why they need to share it between agencies, or why they need to keep it beyond the decision to grant or deny an employee’s religious accommodation request. The Federal Register announcements raised eyebrows for Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt. In his public comment to the Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg stating strenuous opposition to the list creation, he noted: On November 18, at the direction of the Biden administration, four federal agencies simultaneously announced that those who exercise their legal right to seek a health or religious waiver from a vaccine mandate would be tracked in federal databases. Rather than give the public ample time to weigh in on the advisability or legality of collecting such personal information, the Department of Transportation’s database in particular became effective on the day it was published… The chilling effect on a citizens’ exercise of religion due to the creation of this Database is alarming… the federal government decrees that a citizen who seeks a medical exemption or a waiver based on a sincerely held religious belief has automatically consented to being entered in the Database. To put it plainly, invoking the legal right to exercise one’s religious faith risks simultaneously waiving that legal right. The day we broke the story on the Pre-trial Services Agency announcement in the federal register, the notice had 16 views. As of the publication of this story, it now has more than 13,000.
The risk of animals spreading SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, to people is low.
The virus can spread from people to animals during close contact.
More studies are needed to understand if and how different animals could be affected by COVID-19.
People with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 should avoid contact with animals, including pets, livestock, and wildlife.
Based on the available information to date, the risk of animals spreading COVID-19 to people is considered to be low.
At this time, there is no evidence that animals play a significant role in spreading SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, to people. More studies are needed to understand if and how different animals could be affected by SARS-CoV-2.
People can spread SARS-CoV-2 to animals, especially during close contact.
Reports of animals infected with SARS-CoV-2 have been documented around the world. Most of these animals became infected after contact with people with COVID-19, including owners, caretakers, or others who were in close contact. We don’t yet know all of the animals that can get infected. Animals reported infected include:
Animals in zoos and sanctuaries, including several types of big cats, otters, non-human primates, a binturong, a coatimundi, a fishing cat, and hyenas.
Mink on mink farms.
Wild white-tailed deer in several U.S. states.
Sarah Parshall Perry@SarahPPerry
