POLITICAL NEWS
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

POLITICAL NEWS

814 Posts
14 Users
3351 Reactions
21.4 K Views
Patricia N.
Posts: 4815
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Trump: I Will Start Pardoning January 6 Rioters My First Day in Office:

President-elect Donald Trump said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that he was planning to pardon those involved in the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 as soon as his first day in office.

Host Kristen Welker said, “I asked the President-elect if he plans to follow through on his campaign promise to pardon those who attacked the Capitol on January 6, including the more than 900 people who pleaded guilty to a crime.”

Trump said, “I’m going to look at everything. We’ll look at individual cases. But I’m going to be acting very quickly.”

Welker said, “Within your first 100 days, first day?”

Trump said, “First day.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/12/08/trump-i-will-start-pardoning-january-6-rioters-my-first-day-in-office/

Reply
Patricia N.
Posts: 4815
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

REPORT: Evidence Suggests FDR Let Pearl Harbor Happen to Force America into WWII:

83 years ago yesterday, America was brought into war with what was described then, and has been described consistently since, as a “sneak attack” by Imperial Japan.

Then-President Franklin Roosevelt gave a speech on December 8th before Congress where he described it as a “Day of Infamy” where America was suddenly and deliberately attacked.

What Roosevelt failed to mention is that he knew the attack was going to happen, the government had received copious warnings about what was going to happen, and those warnings were not only ignored but steps were taken to facilitate the Japanese attack.

A series of events and factual matters strongly suggest that Roosevelt not only wanted war, but employed his top officials to help him in that effort.
[Lots of information in this article in case you have not heard of this previously.]
 
Reply
Terry
Posts: 1122
Registered
(@terry)
Famed Member
Joined: 2 years ago

Everybody's known about Roosevelt's murderous trickery for years.  I wonder why a splash is being made about it now.  Is something else afoot?

Reply
1 Reply
Patricia N.
Registered
(@patrician)
Joined: 6 years ago

Illustrious Member
Posts: 4815

@terry 

I bet there are lots of people who don't know about it, or else they think it's a conspiracy theory.  Anyway, there wasn't a mention of Pearl Harbor on December 7th on any other news that I watched or read.  I thought that was odd.

Reply
Terry
Posts: 1122
Registered
(@terry)
Famed Member
Joined: 2 years ago

I neglected to mention, interesting reading anyway; thanks.

Reply
Patricia N.
Posts: 4815
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Mike Lee catches NBC News omitting words from Constitution — then he reveals why NBC anchor didn't want you to hear them:

Speaking with President-elect Donald Trump about his plan to end birthright citizenship — which grants United States citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil — Welker tried to suggest the plan is unconstitutional by citing the first sentence of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.

After Trump confirmed that ending birthright citizenship is "absolutely" his plan, Welker said, "The 14th Amendment, though, says that, quote, 'All persons born in the United States are citizens.'"

But there is a significant problem with Welker's quote, according to Lee.

In fact, Welker omitted six words from the first sentence of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment — and those "words matter," Lee explained.

Here is what the beginning of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment actually says:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

This means that Welker omitted the phrase, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," to create the illusion that Trump would be acting unconstitutionally if he sought to outlaw birthright citizenship.

But according to Lee, that critical phrase empowers Congress to define what it means, and, therefore, to regulate birthright citizenship.

"Congress has the power to define what it means to be born in the United States 'and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,'" Lee explained. "While current law contains no such restriction, Congress could pass a law defining what it means to be born in the United States 'and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,' excluding prospectively from birthright citizenship individuals born in the U.S. to illegal aliens."

Importantly, Lee pointed out that Congress has attempted to regulate birthright citizenship in the past.

In 1993, for example, then-Sen. Harry Reid (D) proposed legislation that would have limited birthright citizenship to children whose mothers are either U.S. citizens or permanent legal residents. Ultimately, the bill did not become law. But, Lee said, it demonstrates that Congress is well aware of its ability to regulate birthright citizenship.

In the end, Lee condemned NBC and Welker for "one-sided" coverage, explaining why he believes Welker omitted that key provision from the 14th Amendment.

"[Meet the Press] seems to try to render a debatable matter beyond debate by selectively omitting key words from the Constitution, making it appear incorrectly that the Fourteenth Amendment proscribes any and all restrictions on birthright citizenship," Lee said.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/mike-lee-nbc-constitution-birthright-citizenship   

Reply
Patricia N.
Posts: 4815
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

NYC Mayor Adams eyes executive action to roll back sanctuary policies:

Adams seeks to circumvent the far-left city council members standing in ICE's way.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) stated Sunday that he is weighing executive action to amend the city's sanctuary status, bypassing the Democratic-controlled New York City Council.
He insisted that he has been advocating for more cooperation between ICE and New York City law enforcement prior to the November election.

Adams was asked whether he would consider allowing ICE to reopen its outpost at Rikers Island.

Last week, New York City Council member Robert Holden, a fellow Democrat, challenged Adams to back up his "tough talk" on the city's sanctuary policies by reopening ICE's office to facilitate easier communication between the city and federal immigration agents.

Adams told Kramer on Sunday, "I heard one councilman state that, indicating a litmus test. I'm not into litmus tests. I'm into solving problems."

https://www.theblaze.com/news/nyc-mayor-adams-eyes-executive-action-to-roll-back-sanctuary-policies   

Reply
Patricia N.
Posts: 4815
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

The ‘TERRIFYING’ theory on the mysterious fleet of drones spotted near Trump golf course:

Over the last few weeks, clusters of large drones have been spotted flying around the Raritan River, which is located near North Central New Jersey. These alleged sightings have sparked concerns due to their proximity to President-elect Donald Trump’s Bedminster golf course as well as Picatinny Arsenal, a U.S. military research and manufacturing facility.

According to reports, these drones have been appearing since mid-November and usually return on a daily basis, flying in formation. In response, the FAA has issued temporary flight restrictions over Bedminster golf course and Picatinny Arsenal.

The FBI has also been investigating.

However, the FBI and Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas’ involvement doesn’t make Glenn Beck feel any better. 

“Does anybody think [Mayorkas] has any credibility whatsoever? He's like, ‘Well, I don't know what's going on,”’ he says, pointing out that Mayorkas also didn’t know what was going on at our border.

The FBI as well as New Jersey law enforcement have given similar statements, claiming that they don’t know where these drones came from or what their purpose is.

“That could very well be surveillance on the average American because they’re doing police work, [or] it could be our government doing it,” he says, noting that the sheer size of these drones (some reportedly as big as cars) likely aren’t owned by hobbyists.

“I think this is most likely our government. Second most likely — this is a China balloon,” he says. “The Chinese military drones that are in these gigantic fields, and thousands of thousands of them are flying in formation ... God forbid we get into World War III."

https://www.theblaze.com/shows/the-glenn-beck-program/trump-assassination-2670395465  

Reply
Patricia N.
Posts: 4815
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Biden White House Announces $20 Billion Loan to Ukraine Using Stolen, Frozen Russian Assets:

The Biden administration announced a controversial $20 billion loan to Ukraine on Tuesday.

The kicker? The funds are derived from frozen Russian assets, which critics are calling outright theft and an unprecedented gamble with international norms.

This decision is part of a broader $50 billion package orchestrated by the Group of Seven (G7) nations, aiming to support Ukraine amidst its ongoing conflict with Russia.

“These funds – paid for by the windfall proceeds earned from Russia’s own immobilized assets – will provide Ukraine a critical infusion of support as it defends its country against an unprovoked war of aggression,” Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen said in a statement.
Reply
Page 65 / 65
Share: