FDA Announces New Safety Warning on All mRNA COVID Vaccines — Cites “Extremely High” Risk of Myocarditis and Long-Term Heart Damage in Young Men:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Trump administration has formally updated the safety labeling on all mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to reflect what many Americans have been warning about for years: a disturbingly high risk of myocarditis—particularly in young men—and the possibility of long-term, irreversible heart damage.

The revised warnings apply to both Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax vaccines and follow months of mounting pressure over transparency and accountability regarding the true risks of these experimental injections.

The update stems from new studies and data showing persistent cardiac abnormalities months after vaccination—especially among males aged 12 to 24.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/fda-announces-new-safety-warning-all-mrna-covid/   

Australian government races to destroy evidence of covid vaccine harms:

The Australian Government is planning to destroy irreplaceable clinical data and biological samples from the QoVAX study, which investigated the safety and efficacy of various covid vaccines in over 10,000 people in Queensland.

The Government’s decision to destroy the globally important data and samples has raised concerns about a cover-up, as it comes after a series of actions that indicate it wants to bury the truth about covid vaccine harms.

It looks like the Government does not want to know the awful facts. No public analysis will be done – the public, who paid for the study, will not get the results. It looks like the Government knows the truth. We need to demand this data.

The Government cover-up continues ………. what a disgrace. Watch this space. I’m sure this is not the end of the story. We must hold the Government to account.

https://expose-news.com/2025/07/02/australian-gov-races-to-destroy-evidence/

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-07-03-reverse-heart-disease-through-dietary-choices.html

Sex-changing frogs and infertile humans: Will MAHA target infamous herbicide contaminating America's water?

Atrazine is one of the most extensively used herbicides in the United States. On average, well over 70 million pounds of atrazine is sprayed every year on agricultural crops like corn and sugarcane.

FDA approval process is broken: Hundreds of drugs do not work, some have dangerous adverse effects:

Most FDA-Approved Drugs Did Not Meet the Agency’s Basic Criteria

A two-year investigation conducted by The Lever and the McGraw Centre for Business Journalism uncovered a disturbing pattern within the FDA: In nearly a decade, the agency approved hundreds of prescription drugs without requiring substantial and robust proof of their effectiveness.²

These findings were based on various evidence, including “government reports, internal FDA documents, investigators’ notes, congressional testimony, court records and more than 100 interviews with researchers, federal officials and patients,” the Children’s Health Defence (“CHD”) reports.³

• The FDA relied on four essential standards to assess a drug’s effectiveness and safety.  According to the authors of the report, while these criteria don’t confirm “sound scientific evidence,” they do provide the minimum standard that determines drug manufacturers have given “substantial” evidence to back up their claims. These include:

• Control group.  Patients were tested versus a control group that received a placebo treatment or a comparator drug.
• Replication. There must be at least two “well-controlled” trials that also prove the drugs work as they should.
• Blinding.  The subjects and their physicians must not be aware which among the participants are receiving the drug and which ones are in the control group.
• Clinical endpoint.  Instead of relying on surrogate markers like lab results, the studies must show a significant effect on the patients’ survival or function.

However, after an intensive analysis, the reporters found that the majority of the FDA-approved medications failed to meet these basic criteria.

• Nearly 3 out of 4 new drug approvals did not comply with these criteria.  Among all the drugs approved by the FDA between 2013 and 2022, 73% failed to meet these foundational standards that prove the drugs work as expected.⁴ “Fifty-five of the approved drugs met only one of those four standards, and 39 met none of them,” the CHD notes.

• Drugs were green-lit despite insufficient data presented by manufacturers.  The Lever found that more than half of approvals were based on preliminary data – without considering sound evidence, such as whether the patient experienced fewer symptoms, had improved function, or lived.

• Particularly concerning are cancer drugs.  Based on their findings, of the 123 FDA-approved cancer medications, only 2.4% met all four of the FDA’s scientific criteria. On the other hand, 29 of these drugs tested (23%) did not meet a single criterion.

https://expose-news.com/2025/07/09/fda-approval-process-is-broken/