No, you are not crazy Dan. I don't think these 26,000 scientists are crazy, either. Petition: 26,000 Scientists Oppose 5G Roll Out Concerns about the upcoming launch of 5G radio telecommunications technology have prompted a mass petition against the move on safety grounds by thousands of scientists and related professionals. https://www.smart-safe.com/blogs/news/petition-26-000-scientists-oppose-5g-roll-out Scientific American also says it is unsafe: There’s No Safe Way to Implement 5G Similarly, in an article8 on the Environmental Health Trust’s website, Ronald Powell, Ph.D., a retired Harvard scientist of applied physics, notes “there is NO SAFE WAY to implement 5G in our communities; rather, there are only ‘bad ways’ and ‘worse ways,’” and rather than argue about who should have control over its deployment, we should focus on preventing its employment altogether. Indeed, mounting research9,10 suggest the proliferation of 5G for the sake of faster wireless internet could be a public health disaster, so if 5G does end up “replacing cable internet for good,” humanity may be in for a devastating shock in coming decades, if not sooner. While it may take years to fully ascertain the full effects of 5G, there are early warning signs. People have reported mass die-offs of bees around 5G towers in California,11 for example, and residents in Gateshead in the U.K. started reported insomnia, chronic nosebleeds and stillbirths after the installation of streetlamps that emit 5G radiation in 2016.12 ‘No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe,’ Scientific American Says https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/11/joseph-mercola/scientific-american-warns-5g-is-unsafe/ Whatever the case, safe or not, 5 gee will be used in a spy/police state. It is essential for that. It is definitely a sign that we are close to the Lord's return. Yeah, in an extended 5G implementation one major advantage would be ubiquity of signal availability to monitor proximity of portable devices to various nearby base stations, each having a small coverage footprint. So in that regard it would help in beneficial and nefarious use both, for locating personal communicators of all kinds. Yet I believe offsetting economics problems will get worse slowing 5G network deployment. Such deployment of 5G network elements is quite capital intensive. So with this already-begun economic crash there will be far less capital generated for advancing rapid network deployment and expansion, particularly from a consumer demand-pull perspective, wherein as in the past people with disposable income would rush to their cell phone stores to keep up with the latest toys -- including 5G. But in any case, I will until either my dying day or the Rapture -- whichever comes first -- contend that no realistic radiation-based arguments can be made, much less proven, relative to hyped 5G safety risks. No "Uncle!" from me. No problem with that. We'll ask Jesus when we get there. 😉 Well I'm kinda expecting in heaven (and probably here and everywhere in the universe for that matter) quantum effects based communications is employed. Maybe we'll experience 777G communications and understand a little bit about its protocols, coding, encryption, etc., kinda using principles as Einstein observed, "spooky action at a distance." Can't wait! Sort of the positive flip side of the Beatles negative hit song "Imagine!" Arthur, I would propose, is this just another lie. Are we sure these scientist have stated this, after all the media does not ever lie and always speaks truth, right? :groan :prayer-hands: That is a possibility. After all, tens of thousands of scientists supposedly signed on to the global warming agenda. Still, 5G is something they desperately need to achieve their plan of "full spectrum dominance. " Are these scientists controlled opposition? I suspect things will be made clear fairly soon. Hey Dan, as you are quite knowledgable about electricity, what is your opinion on the Electric Universe model? Oh I love the concept, Arthur. It makes so much sense to me! I first heard about it in a prophecy conference presentation by Stan Deo a few years ago. I've watched hours and hours of presentations from the Thunderbolts Project, although probably not recently. How about you, Arthur? Your take...? Yeah, I agree 100%. I am familiar with Stan Deo and have watched a number of the Thunderbolts videos. Makes perfect sense for me as a layman. Plus, a 6,000 year old universe is not a problem with this model. So, yes, I subscribe to the Electric Universe model. :good:
Posted on March 11 2019
