The Abomination of ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

The Abomination of Desolation As a Reactionary Event

8 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
653 Views
Loz
Posts: 769
 Loz
Registered
Topic starter
(@loz73)
Noble Member
Joined: 7 years ago
[#2653]

The Abomination of Desolation As a Reactionary Event

Heather R

Streamed live 14 hours ago

“Fair Use For Education and Discussion Purposes”

Loz :]


7 Replies
Posts: 52
Registered
(@heatherr)
Trusted Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Thanks for sharing, Loz!

I know many people don't particularly care about this subject, because we aren't going to be around for it. But putting things into a bit of perspective... the Mark of the Beast comes AFTER the Abomination of Desolation. I figure if that seems be a topic of conversation, then perhaps this might give that conversation a wee bit more context. :bye:


Reply
MyWhiteStone
Posts: 1339
Registered
(@mywhitestone)
Noble Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Thank you again and again, Heather, for your years of study and commitment to publishing and explaining these linked facets in Scripture, tying them in context with each other.  True, we know we are going in the Rapture and won't be around, but we have read and re-read, and re-read these passages without the many connection points you link together coming to our mind.

Many years ago I had no appetite to unravel anything in Revelation beyond chapter 5.  Even sometimes beyond Revelation 4:1.  Maybe the Lord is keeping me (us) here after school, so to speak, because we didn't learn these valuable (and blessed) lessons during regular hours, yet the curriculum is truly valuable both to us and to the Lord who, through you too, is schooling us.  Thanks again, Teacher.


Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Well we got to be getting close to departure ... Geoffrey @ NTEB has an updated article about Amazon One really pushing the palm payment system.

“Contactless biometric payment system uses your hand to “buy and sell” like in Revelation 13:16-17

 

Interesting in the comment section someone pointed out

The King James Bible and I just checked the Geneva Bible (oldest Bible translation? :unsure: ) both say:  in their right hand or in their foreheads ... big difference with the word in because that sounds like an implanted microchip vs. the other translations say on or upon that seems to imply a tattoo?   What are your thoughts?

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads.
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

 

Other translations

NKJV

He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has [a]the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

NIV
It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads,

 

Darby Bible Translation
And it causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free and the bondmen, that they should give them a mark upon their right hand or upon their forehead;

 


Reply
Posts: 52
Registered
(@heatherr)
Trusted Member
Joined: 7 years ago

You're most welcome! I love researching! It's fun, and I constantly find new things. The Bible is my playground :mail:


Reply
Page 1 / 2
Share: