There is so much news, I am not sure if this has been posted. At 27:35 they talk about Biden working with the UN and "close" to declaring executive order on climate emergency. -Fair Use- Wow, thanks. They're making it sound like soon. Couldn't they at least wait until after Feast of Trumpets? The article was dated August 14 and it hasn't happened yet. But just think about the sudden destruction that happens when they say peace and safety and we leave. That will be the perfect event to blame on climate change. U.K. Population Collapse “Good for the Planet”, WEF Adviser Prof Sarah Harper Explains: Remember how depopulation was called a right-wing conspiracy theory? Things have changed, and ‘population collapse’, which can no longer be denied, is now good for us! Prof Harper told the Telegraph: “I think it’s a good thing that the high-income, high-consuming countries of the world are reducing the number of children that they’re having. I’m quite positive about that.” The academic said declining fertility in rich countries would help to address the “general overconsumption that we have at the moment”, which has a negative impact on the planet. Research has found that wealthy nations tend to have much larger carbon footprints than poorer countries, as rich people can afford to buy more goods, travel more and do other activities that generate emissions. Carbon emissions from high-income countries were 29 times larger than low-income countries on a per capita basis in 2020, World Bank figures show. . . . However, something entirely different is going on! While the population of local-born natives is no longer reproducing at the levels needed to maintain the population, new immigration picks up. It accounts for a larger and larger share of births! While the number of births in Britain is declining, the share of children born to parents who immigrated from outside Britain has hit a record high. This inconsistency is not something I can quite understand: New immigrants want to consume just as much as native residents. Why encourage immigration from poor countries to rich countries if the goal is a reduction of carbon and other emissions that would occur due to declines in the population of rich countries? . . . What do they really want? This inconsistency is not something I can quite understand: New immigrants want to consume just as much as native residents. Why encourage immigration from poor countries to rich countries if the goal is a reduction of carbon and other emissions that would occur due to declines in the population of rich countries? The idea is to dilute the national identity to the point that there isn't one. Same in America. The elite believe they will have the upper hand on a group of people with no loyalty to their country. Killing them off later won't be nearly as difficult.
Most importantly, declines in births will bring about reductions in CO2 emissions from wealthy nations, Prof Harper points out:
