Coronavirus Talk v....
 
Notifications
Clear all

Coronavirus Talk v.14

103 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
15.1 K Views
Leaving Soon
Posts: 999
Registered
(@cantwait)
Noble Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Yep, we probably talked about this over 12 months ago. They will make your life impossible unless you join their suicide cult. They won't even let you order anything online or have anything delivered at all including groceries soon if you don't accept what their peddling on all of humanity.


Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Eek! :calvin

How many of you are surprised we are still here in the midst of this evil and if we stay any longer … it will not freely be “business as usual”?

Nice find of what the backwards meaning of COVID means … possession by an evil spirit. Translated into English DIVOC becomes DYBBUK. Eek!

And 19 backwards is 91 … I was trying to find the meaning of 91 …

Strong's Concordance
Agagi: a descriptive term for Haman 😉

Haman wanted to wipe out the Jews but instead his demonic scheme backfired and they hanged him instead from the 50-cubit-high gallows :whistle:

Also means of a people of Haman (= Amalekite ?) from 'Agag; an Agagite or descendent (subject) of Agag -- Agagite. So could it be … these evil ones in power right now that are pushing this mandate of the jab on us are nothing more but descendants of Haman? :unsure:

We have this comforting Psalm to cling to …

Psalm 91 is a beautiful song that speaks of trust in God in the darkest of times. Because of its references to 'diseases' and 'plagues”.

Then we have NYC showing that “HadesTown” play on Broadway only to those who are vaxx starting September 2nd … how can you not think of the symbolism … “broad is the way that leads to destruction …

The departure flight :flyup: :flyup: :flyup: :flyup: :flyup: :flyup: hast to be soon!


Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Interesting comment on why the possible rush for the FDA to approve the Pfizer vaxx

 

She said

I don't think FDA approval was expected until next month at best, I am wondering if they did this to get attention away from the Afghanistan failure. According to the most recent polls Harris' approval rating has sunk even further:

"In the latest survey charting her fall in popularity, Rasmussen Reports said that just 43% believe that she’s qualified to run the nation versus 55% who do not believe that she is qualified. Of that, 47% of likely voters said she is “not at all qualified.”

Those poor numbers probably result from the bad “impression” she has left on the country amid failures to fix the border crisis and get liberal election reform passed in Congress. There have been several reports of staff infighting, and she has been radio silent during the Afghanistan crisis despite earlier being a champion of Afghan women.

Rasmussen asked likely voters for their impression of the first black and female vice president. They are mostly underwhelmed. By a margin of 56% to 41%, those polled said they had an unfavorable view of the former California Democratic senator."

Although most feel she will replace Biden before his term is out, I think the Democrats knows she is too unpopular at the present to replace Biden, so Biden has to remain in office for now, and they are trying to avert our attention from Afghanistan.

 

- Fair Use -


Reply
Posts: 8052
Registered
(@tenderreed)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 7 years ago

It's like watching a chess match being played out for the free world and commenting on the beads of sweat with each move made!

At this point they could hardly care less about approval ratings!  Their brazeness has already proven this!


Reply
Posts: 436
Registered
(@gratefulforgrace)
Reputable Member
Joined: 7 years ago

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download

"We did not refer your application to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products
Advisory Committee because our review of information submitted in your BLA, including
the clinical study design and trial results, did not raise concerns or controversial issues
that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion."

-fair use for education and comment-

is that "normal"? to not be referred to vaccine advisory committee?...trial results and all the extended experimental results certainly raised concerns for a lot of us...and sure seems like a ton of "controversial issues" have risen in the wake of these shots being used...it sounds to me like they didn't even consider anything outside of the official trials??  what about all the adverse affects on the masses after/during their official trial??

this is not good news...but thankfully we will always have The Good News...i think we are outta here sooo soon!!! may it be Lord, please!


Reply
Page 5 / 21
Share: