NEWS: POLITICAL v.2
 
Notifications
Clear all

NEWS: POLITICAL v.2

64 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
10.4 K Views
churchgal
Posts: 767
Registered
(@churchgal)
Prominent Member
Joined: 7 years ago

This is from worldcouncilforhealth.org
Background
The International Health Regulations (IHR) was adopted by 194 member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005. They enable the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) if it decides that an infectious disease outbreak has occurred in a member state, but with the consent of the member state. The World Council for Health (WCH) acknowledges this aspect of the current regulations because it recognizes the sovereignty of nations that adopted the IHR. But that is about to change.

I wanted to post all the info on the page that gives all the details but I couldn't post for some reason.


Reply
churchgal
Posts: 767
Registered
(@churchgal)
Prominent Member
Joined: 7 years ago

 

On January 18th 2022, the United States Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the IHR. These amendments give control over the declaration of a public health emergency in any member state to the WHO Director-General – even over the objection of the member state. The Director-General communicated the text of the proposed amendments on 20 January 2022, via a circular letter to State Parties.

The proposed IHR amendments also cede control to WHO “regional directors,” who are given the authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC). Moreover, the proposed amendments allow the Director-General to ring an international alarm bell, by unilaterally issuing an “Intermediate Public Health Alert (IPHA).”

Properly understood, the proposed IHR amendments are directed towards establishing a globalist architecture of worldwide health surveillance, reporting, and management. Consistent with a top-down view of governance, the public will not have opportunities to provide input or criticism concerning the amendments. This, of course, is a direct violation of the basic tenets of democracy and can be compared to the separate new pandemic treaty.

Here is a bit more of it


Reply
Yohanan
Posts: 3991
Moderator
Topic starter
(@yohanan)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Should they try to impose their directives on the United States the only way it could be enforced is by the military of the United States. Anything else would be considered an invasion. Given the debacle of the past two years I do not think the American public would stand for a foreign entity trying to control them.


Reply
Patricia N.
Posts: 7272
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 7 years ago

WAKE UP CALL - US Military Intelligence Reveals Evidence Of Election Fraud:

Former US Army Colonel Phil Waldron explains how top-level military technology reveals how the 2020 presidential elections were stolen.

[Video at link.]

https://rumble.com/v145bi1-wake-up-call-us-military-intelligence-reveals-evidence-of-election-fraud.html


Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Sean Osborne - May 14, 2022 at 5:59 AM

Breaking: There may be big trouble brewing in Red China. Xi is reported to have suffered a cerebral aneurysm in late 2021, and his health has deteriorated since. There are also rumors of a possible coup d'etat over his handling of the COVID crisis in Chinese cities, extreme lockdowns, etc.

The health issues of both Russian and Chinese leaders, and coup rumors in both capitals, at this time is not any coincidence.

 

- Fair Use -


Reply
Page 5 / 13
Share: