Major announcement ...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Major announcement today? (9/15)

23 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
662 Views
Todd Tomlinson
Posts: 552
Registered
Topic starter
(@pdxtodd)
Prominent Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Not sure what to take of this article:

https://gizmodo.com/something-important-happening-at-5-00-pm-today-report-1847678435

"What on Earth could be happening? Your guess is as good as ours. But the inclusion of the opposition party in Australia’s meeting has us concerned that it has to do with war or a major upheaval in the international order. Australia is part of the so-called Five-Eyes alliance of countries that collect and share intelligence, including U.S., Canada, the UK, and New Zealand."

I guess we'll find out today!

Fair use for educational purposes only.

 

 

22 Replies
Susan
Posts: 553
Registered
(@susan)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 years ago

I betcha somethings up with China bullying Australia. They seem to be doing a lot of this lately

Anyway, praying about it

Reply
Posts: 347
Guest
(@Anonymous 161)
Reputable Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Australia is also has one of the largest pedophilia rings in the world. Ive lost all respect for that country.

 

Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Hey Todd,

After reading your link … I saw this article … perhaps the announcement is for the D10 nations confederacy? :unsure:

 

As Australia announces that they are working to advance the New World Order, they are also pushing the global D10 Ten Nation Confederacy

NTEB

Australia says the D10 should be embraced. It could start to consolidate the world’s leading democracies and bring in the New World Order and Ten Nation Confederacy.

The nation of Australia has been lighting up Google searches related to ‘New World Order‘, and for good reason, they have been announcing from the highest levels of their own government that they are using COVID-19 mandates to advance the….well, you know…New World Order. Their words, not mine. Oh yeah, almost forgot, they are joining something called the D10, a ten nation confederacy to advance the, you know, New World Order. Honestly, I don’t have to work all that hard at this anymore, they’re making it way too easy.

“And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.”Revelation 13:1

There’s a great line in the movie ‘Field Of Dreams’, where James Earl Jones is telling Kevin Costner not worry, because “people will come and they won’t know why, it will be something they just have to do”. So it is with the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, the lost leaders of our combined world governments are do what they ‘just have to do’, without any understand of why they are doing it. Does Anthony Fauci understand he is a tool of the Devil, does Bill Gates, George Soros or the leaders of the godless United Nations? Does Joe Biden understand he sold his soul to the Devil for a ‘mess of pottage’? Does Australia know what it’s saying when they throw around the term ‘new world order’ like they do? Not likely, but if you are saved and read and believe your King James Bible, you certainly do know all these things, and much more.

Time for the D10 to replace the G7?
From Australian Strategic Policy Institute: The D10 makes sound strategic sense. The G7 as a forum for the leaders of the world’s largest powers to discuss strategic economic matters has long been superseded by the G20 (in 2008 after the global financial crisis). And the G7, despite ejecting Russia in 2014 for invading Ukraine, has lost much of its geopolitical rationale, not least because world power is no longer so concentrated in the Euro-Atlantic region. The Indo-Pacific is now the cockpit of the global economy and the stage for international geopolitical competition.

Will the D10 fly? Perhaps. Reducing the G7’s Eurocentricity would almost certainly entice countries with Indo-Pacific flanks, such as Japan, the US, Canada and France (through its overseas territories). The British proposal may also prove attractive to the three prospective new members—Australia, India and South Korea—because they would get to join what would likely become the top table for the world’s leading democracies. It may even appeal to European countries like Germany and Italy by giving them a voice in a region they have little means to influence by themselves.

And what would the D10 do?  For Britain, the D10 is, in part, about “decoupling” from China.  Its is about creating a new coalition to provide an alternative to China’s attempts to dominate world markets and set international standards, particularly in relation to next-generation technologies such as 5G.

Beijing’s mishandling of the Covid-19 outbreak and subsequent attempts to revise the 1984 Sino-British agreement on Hong Kong have irked London tremendously. Only in March did the British government confirm that Huawei would be allowed to remain inside its 5G system, if only on the so-called periphery—despite fierce warnings against the move from the US and Australia. Since then, China’s actions, combined with mounting pressure from backbench Conservative parliamentarians, including the newly formed China Research Group, as well as opposition parties, have tried to persuade Prime Minister Boris Johnson to backtrack on the Huawei decision.

The UK may appear an odd architect for a New Democratic alliance, particularly one centered on the Indo-Pacific.  Despite its overseas territories in the Indian and Pacific oceans, and its military reach into the region, Britain is an Atlantic power. But does that necessarily matter?

As an established democracy, the UK has a track record of bolting together successful international endeavours. It played a key role in the formation of the maritime law, the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It also put in place the Indo-Pacific’s only multinational security formation—the Five Power Defence Arrangements—which Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has suggested his country should join.

In any case, given the enormous and growing power that China could bring to bear against its adversaries, is it not time to think more strategically about the Indo-Pacific? Already, in terms of population, industrial yield and technological potential, China is the most powerful competitor the UK or US has ever faced. There is nothing to suggest that Xi Jinping—who became president for life in 2018—will cease his quest to dominate economically, technologically and strategically, as well as push back against liberal and democratic ideals. Are the other countries of the Indo-Pacific prepared?

The D10 should be embraced. It could start to consolidate the world’s leading democracies’ ability to uphold their autonomy and push back against authoritarian revisionists. It would help ensure that the Indo-Pacific of the 21st century remains free and open and does not become controlled and closed.

- Fair Use -

Reply
Susan
Posts: 553
Registered
(@susan)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Oh yes Geri, you are so right. This very well could be the beginning of the 10 Nation Con. that Australia leads us into

Wow!This slipped right passed me

 

 

Reply
Susan
Posts: 553
Registered
(@susan)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Forget the G-7, Build the D-10
ERIK BRATTBERG, BEN JUDAH

The canceled G-7 summit this week, unfortunately, is no great misfortune. Though it’s a shame that the group of seven major industrialized nations’ leaders were not able to gather amid the raging global pandemic—and perhaps, even more likely, due to mounting tensions between the United States and its allies—the grouping was always unlikely to achieve much with U.S. President Donald Trump at the helm. That’s why it proved so easy for world leaders to miss.

Trump seemed to recognize this dated 1970s format was insufficient when he proposed inviting India, South Korea, Australia, and Russia to join a rescheduled summit in September. However, including a hostile actor like Vladimir Putin’s Russia in this group of leading democracies was obviously a nonstarter—especially since the G-20 already exists as a separate, broader grouping that includes both Russia and China.

But creative thinking across the Atlantic at No. 10 Downing St. is heading in the right direction. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been actively considering the right idea: consolidating a new D-10 group of 10 leading democracies (the current G-7 members, plus South Korea, India, and Australia) for addressing both 5G mobile communications and vulnerable supply chains. While the idea behind a D-10 is not a novel one—a group organized by the Atlantic Council think tank in Washington has been promoting it for years with regular working-level meetings between officials—it has a new impetus amid the coronavirus pandemic.

As Beijing attempts to deflect away from its own mishandling of the virus’s initial outbreak in Wuhan and its lack of transparency, it is also engaging in "wolf warrior" diplomacy, propaganda and online disinformation campaigns against the United States and its allies and partners. Stories of faulty Chinese-made masks and other vital medical equipment have also circulated widely around the world. That has drawn new attention to the risks associated with relying on Chinese-made 5G infrastructure and critical supply chains. Countries from Canada to Britain to Germany are already rethinking whether to allow Huawei to build out their next-generation 5G networks. Meanwhile, the United States, the European Union, and Japan are all currently considering options for reducing dependence on China for the supply of pharmaceuticals and medical equipment, and possibly other critical sectors as well.

The United Kingdom’s D-10 is the right size and shape: neither too big, which reduces coherence; nor too small, covering only the Cold War West. The D-10 is not an anti-China alliance. Instead, by narrowly focusing on the two defensive issues all democratic powers broadly agree they have a problem and cannot solve on their own—5G and critical supply chains—it is a platform that could relatively quickly get off the ground. Moreover, the D-10 is attractive to both foreign-policy “restrainers” as well as “competitors” alike, as actively reducing these two strategic vulnerabilities and heated public concerns can work to lessen future tensions with Beijing.

Britain is well suited to play a key role in such an effort. After flip-flopping on its decision from January to allow Huawei a limited role in building out Britain’s next 5G wireless network, Downing Street is now signaling resolve to reverse prior over-reliance on China. British foreign policy is regaining confidence over Hong Kong: a case in point being London’s offer to provide open-ended residency and thus pathway to citizenship to over 2.5 million Hong Kong citizens, should Beijing impose the regressive national security law it passed on the city. The British government is also planning a tightening of its foreign investment screening legislation. Britain is also regaining trust with its Five Eyes allies, which have been strained due to London’s previous unwillingness to question its dependence on China. Britain’s convening power is returning too, as a recent joint letter signed by the U.K., Canada, Australia, and the United States addressing the situation in Hong Kong indicates.

D-10 is a golden opportunity for London to put some meat on the bones on the still unproven “Global Britain” concept pitched by Johnson and others in the wake of Brexit. To further advance the D-10, the U.K. should seek to convene its first summit in London by early next year. In an effort to put differences over Brexit aside, London should reach out to Paris and Berlin to explore if there is interest in jointly proposing the D-10, with the EU and other European powers attending including Italy, which is also a G-7 member, but also Spain, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Poland as occasional participants depending on the topic at hand. This would be in the long-standing format of the G-7 summits: The leaders of nine non-member states, including India and Australia, attended the 2019 summit in Biarritz, France.

The focus of these discussions should be, firstly, on developing cost-effective and technologically sophisticated 5G alternatives to Huawei by enhancing government and industry collaboration within the group of like-minded countries. But they can also tackle how to promote more diverse global supply chains in critical areas while also building new capacities for sourcing components and shifting certain production to outside of China in a coordinated fashion that avoids becoming a slippery slope toward protectionism or U.S.-style “decoupling”.

Britain’s new thinking might be the right move for the EU, too, when it comes to trans-Atlantic relations—regardless of who wins the U.S. presidential election in November. First of all, the D-10 is an insurance policy to bind democratic partners together in two areas where they can actually work fairly constructively with the Trump administration. This was most recently demonstrated by the fact the United States joined the G-7 AI group to set shared ethical guidelines for the use of the emerging technology. Last year, the Trump administration also expressed appreciation for the EU’s efforts to address 5G security risks. Additionally the D-10 opens the door for Europeans to quickly add working groups on climate and multilateralism to the agenda should Trump’s challenger Joe Biden win in November. Looking ahead, the D-10 also offers the United States the perfect platform to implement Biden’s foreign-policy agenda should he win—adding working groups on security, corruption, and human rights—and could grow into a grouping that either formally superseded or met in parallel with the G-7.

The case for trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific democratic allies and partners to join hands in an age of growing great-power competition against China is clear. Quickly building a limited action-oriented D-10 focusing on core issues and not just another talking shop would aid this work while also making it harder for Washington to pursue unilateral approaches or zero-sum thinking toward China.

London is still needed. Despite Brexit, Britain’s role as a bridge between the democracies is far from over: By engaging the other G-7 members on the D-10 idea, it should now work to update Hastings Ismay’s 1949 strategic maxim on NATO, to “keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down,” for a world of 5G and fragile supply chains—a grand strategy for the democracies that will work to keep China in check, India close, and the United States steady in the turbulent years to come.

Erik Brattberg
Erik Brattberg is director of the Europe Program and a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington. He is an expert on European politics and security and transatlantic relations.

Ben Judah
Ben Judah is a British-French journalist and the author of This Is London and Fragile Empire.

https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/06/10/forget-g-7-build-d-10-pub-82062

Reply
Todd Tomlinson
Posts: 552
Registered
Topic starter
(@pdxtodd)
Prominent Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Wow wow wow -- for years I've speculated about who the 10 horns will be.    It is so incredible to see this unfold right before our eyes.

Reply
regina
Posts: 689
Registered
(@regina)
Honorable Member
Joined: 6 years ago

“And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.”Revelation 13:1

out of G7, 10 coming who used to depend upon the 7 for security, who will coordinate security differently, who all want world rule without Jesus. what a spin on coming out of the sea. we'll see if Australia announces anything. if D10 becomes more than talk. thank you Todd.

 

Reply
Yohanan
Posts: 3934
Moderator
(@yohanan)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Good analysis, Regina! It will be interesting to see if this shapes up.

Reply
Susan
Posts: 553
Registered
(@susan)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 years ago

This is exactly what is needed at this time. Before now, we thought this would be a European alliance.

World power is no longer so concentrated in the Euro-Atlantic region. The Indo-Pacific is now the cockpit of the global economy and the stage for international geopolitical competition.

So  it makes perfect sense Euro-Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific should join together to make up this confederacy. Oh wow...............

Reply
Page 1 / 3
Share: