Coronavirus Talk v....
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Coronavirus Talk v.9

109 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
1,600 Views
regina
Posts: 689
Registered
(@regina)
Honorable Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Not surprised one bit … the elite are loving this control of playing these games … right now so many that are not wearing the masks, because they took the jab or pretending they did, are walking around happier. They are going to be so ticked off when they hear they have to go back to wearing the masks again and getting more jabs. You wonder what the breaking point will be if they catch on and say “hey wait a minute” or are they too far gone with the brainwashed deception to question anything?

I recall reading an article a few weeks ago where they have the capability to bring back small pox … that will certainly be far worse than covid.

Reply
Kent
Posts: 769
 Kent
Registered
(@erby)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 years ago

United Health Care sent me a card today telling me that until I’m vaccinated, I need to social distance, wear a mask, and wash my hands. I went for a physical recently, and my doctor asked me if I was vaccinated. I said no.  I reminded him that I taught organic chemistry and understood protein synthesis, so I understood how the vaccine works. End of conversation. So now I get a card from my insurance company. Makes me wonder where this will go.

Reply
Kent
Posts: 769
 Kent
Registered
(@erby)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 years ago

I always ask the question: Why would a person take an injection that contains active genetic molecules (mRNA) from a viral pathogen that will cause your body’s cells to produce the same toxic, inflammatory proteins that this virus makes?  I know I’ve said it before, but I feel it’s worth repeating. The powers that be are relentless. I know first and second hand of so many who are have terrible adverse reactions from the jab.

Reply
Kent
Posts: 769
 Kent
Registered
(@erby)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Supposedly the Biden Administration is sending out task forces to areas that have low vaccination rates. I wonder if they’ll go door to door.

Reply
Kent
Posts: 769
 Kent
Registered
(@erby)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 years ago

People who’ve had the jab could be more susceptible to variants, not to mention the effects from the toxic proteins that their bodies are making. The powers that be will probably falsely blame the unvaccinated for this. That card said that I needed to get vaccinated to protect my loved ones. I am thankful that my family has listened to me and avoided the jab.

Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

I noticed Donald Rumsfeld passed away this week.  He was behind pushing the  artificial sweeteners Splenda/Aspartame on the market even though the FDA refused it.  So the population control agenda, to make Americans ill, goes back way before covid.

Splenda Isn’t So Splendid: The Toxic Rumsfeld-Monsanto Link

Natural Society
By Christina Sarich
November 9, 2014 updated March 29, 2021

As we get closer to the holidays, many people look for ways to cut back on sugar and other indulgences so that when the New Year rolls around, they won’t have to work so hard to lose those extra pounds. While it is a good idea to avoid sugar altogether, using the artificial sweeteners Splenda or Aspartame might be even worse. There are numerous reasons you should avoid the stuff in little yellow packages (or pink, or blue). Here is why.

Donald Rumsfeld, the very same politician who supports GMOs, is perhaps the singular man who got Splenda onto the market after the FDA initially refused it. If you have gotten sick from consuming this toxic substance, you can thank him, along with its makers. Splenda was created by the British company Tate & Lyle along with the pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson.

Perhaps you remember when the Coca-Cola company launched its ad campaign to fight obesity back in the early 80s? This was all part of a ploy to begin the use of aspartame, whose patent was once owned by none other than Monsanto! Ironically, there are numerous studies that show this stuff causes obesity. It doesn’t prevent obesity.

Before they started selling you Splenda, it was called NutraSweet. In 1985, Monsanto purchased G.D. Searle, the chemical company that held the patent to aspartame, the active ingredient in NutraSweet, as well as Splenda and many other artificial sweeteners. Is Splenda safe? It depends who you ask.
Let’s look at a little timeline, shall we?

1901: Monsanto Chemical Works is formed.
1976: When Ford loses the 1976 election, Rumsfeld returns to private business life, and is named president and CEO of the pharmaceutical corporation G. D. Searle & Company, during which time he leads the legalization of Aspartame.
1977: Monsanto stops producing PCBs.
1997: Monsanto businesses are spun off as Solutia Inc.
1999: John Hunter is named chairman and CEO.
2000: Monsanto’s Pharmaceutical Services Division is created. Monsanto also merges with the drug-maker Pharmacia & UpJohn Inc., which took control of the Searle pharmaceutical operations, and the current Monsanto Co. was incorporated as a subsidiary in October 2000.
2002: PCB trial results in sharp drop in stock price.

Dr. James Bowen, a physician and biochemist, says that he developed ALS from aspartame ingestion. He has just recovered form stomach cancer also attributed to aspartame. Bowen has been researching the product since it was given free reign on the market, and it almost cost him his life. He attests that it is a horrible chemical poison that is really just chlorinated sugar.

What’s even more suspect is that Donald Rumsfeld was on the Board of Directors at Monsanto’s Searle pharmaceuticals even before he helped get aspartame through the FDA, and he has been supporting the biotech company’s plans to take over the world seed supply as well.

The sugar substitute was approved for use in foods as a sweetener in 1998. Before approving sucralose, the FDA claimed to have reviewed 110 human and animal studies, but it turns out that only 2 out of those studies were actually on humans.

Splenda is just the trademarked brand name of sucralose, and this is still one of the best selling artificial sweeteners on grocery store shelves today.

Potential Negative Effects of Splenda
Here are just a few of the negative health impacts Splenda can have on people:

Splenda and sucralose consumption alter the healthy micro-flora of the gut, making it more difficult for your immune system to work as it should while fueling gastro-intestinal diseases. In animal studies Splenda reduced the healthy gut flora by 50%! It also affected P-glycoprotein (P-gp) levels.

Splenda alters the efficacy of many drugs. While it would be better to treat your disease with natural remedies, if you are taking meds for cancer or heart disease, Splenda could be interfering with that.

Splenda may even alter genes. This sounds familiar when coming from a company who splices and dices the genome like some kind of freak show. The molecules are manipulated and this may also cause molecules in our bodies to be altered as well.

Splenda causes obesity. This toxic substance alters blood sugar levels and can lead to increased chances of getting diabetes as well as obesity. It tricks your body into eating more, and with more calories, you know what happens – unwanted weight gain.

Splenda shrinks the thymus gland by up to 40%. You need your thymus; it helps to regulate the heart and is responsible for many endocrine functions, including balancing metabolic rate. Why would you want to eat something that shrinks your thymus to the size of rat scat? Yuck.

James Turner, the chairman of the national consumer education group Citizens for Health, has expressed shock and outrage over new reports from scientists outlining the dangers of this substance.

So, while many studies point to its safety, many others (which as less discussed) have found that these artificial sweeteners are actually harmful. It’s up to you to decide whether to ingest this questionable substance or not.

- Fair Use -

Reply
MyWhiteStone
Posts: 1336
Registered
(@mywhitestone)
Noble Member
Joined: 6 years ago

So Geri, if forced to would you prefer a shot of Splenda, or something more Moderna?

Reply
Tammie
Posts: 3494
Registered
(@tammie)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

MWS — Your killing me :mdrmdr: :mdrmdr:  just like John’s - son :mdrmdr: :mdrmdr: the public needs to Pfiz-up and not look to mod- earn-up. :mdrmdr: :mdrmdr: :groan :calvin

Reply
MyWhiteStone
Posts: 1336
Registered
(@mywhitestone)
Noble Member
Joined: 6 years ago

I'd opt for a couple shots of rum 'til the Rum'sfelt.

Reply
Page 8 / 11
Share: