Coronavirus Talk v....
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Coronavirus Talk v.5

70 Posts
12 Users
0 Reactions
828 Views
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

And the truth finally comes out ... the reason they wanted us to stay locked up indoors and is this the real reason Gates hates cows? :scratch:

 

Vitamin D deficiency is the primary cause of covid hospitalizations and deaths.

PatriotDaily Press.com - March 31, 2021

A board-certified pathologist is speaking out about the underlying cause of covid hospitalizations and deaths. Dr. Ryan Cole is the founder of Cole Diagnostics, one of the largest independent laboratories in Idaho. He has studied the real reasons why people suffer from infections. Vitamin D deficiency, which plagues approximately 70 percent of the world’s population, is the real public health issue at hand.

“Normal D levels decrease your COVID symptom severity risk for hospitalization by 90 percent. There have been a lot of placebo-controlled trials that show this all around the world. It is scientific fact, not just a correlation,” said Dr. Cole. “Data shows what kills people. Cytokine storm. If you are in (Vitamin D) mid-level range, you will not die from COVID because you cannot get a cytokine storm.”

Vitamin D deficiency (and covid severity) is prevalent for these groups of people
Some specific groups have more vitamin D deficiency than other people.

 

African Americans and people with dark skin

Vitamin D deficiency is disproportionate among different races and ethnicity. The melanin content of the skin is a determining factor for how well people absorb the sun’s rays, leading to varying levels of vitamin D production within the skin. Vitamin D deficiency affects roughly 47 percent of Caucasians, 70 percent of Latinos, 72 percent of Native Americans and 83 percent of African Americans. Covid-19 has adversely affected African Americans because their skin is not adept to assimilate vitamin D efficiently. This is not a social disparity, as the media advertises. This is a biological issue, one that should prompt every health authority to encourage the African American community to get more sunlight and supplement with vitamin D during the winter months.

 

Obesity and old age

Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent for people who are obese, which is one of the other risk categories for severe covid illness. Because vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin, it is readily stored in fat cells. Circulating vitamin D levels are higher in people who have a healthy weight.

Vitamin D levels are low for elderly people who live a sedentary life or for those who are confined to a dark nursing home environment. “Ninety percent of deaths in the state have been over 70 years of age. That’s the at-risk population,” said Dr. Cole. “We have stopped our society for something that’s taking people that are already at that death risk age anyway.” He added, “96 percent of people in the ICU are Vitamin D deficient.”

 

People living in the Northern Hemisphere

Vitamin D deficiency also affects more people in the Northern hemisphere because these populations typically spend less time in the sun. One reason hospitalization will remain high in the North is because people spend more of their time indoors, avoiding the long cold winters and staying away from the sunlight.

Florida, despite its high density, aging population, continues to handle covid-19 more effectively than all the northern states that are locked down, holding people in bondage. Even though Florida has been criticized for being a free and open state, the population was able to have a lower hospitalization and mortality rate because the people have more access to sunlight throughout the year. The warm temperatures are an opportunity for people to get more sun and have a stronger immune system naturally. The spread of viruses is of little concern if healthy people are overcoming the infection more rapidly, as their immune systems become equipped with higher vitamin D levels.

Public health authorities are taking the wrong approach to public health
No one is entitled to live in a virus safe space, nor is this avoidance approach the most effective and safe approach for overcoming infectious disease. Raising the vitamin D level of people and encouraging exposure could more rapidly help the population overcome the virus. The inevitability of virus exposure is not something anyone can completely control anyway. Public health authorities haven taken the wrong approach to public health by restricting, socially ostracizing, and shaming people for spreading infections they do not have, for which there is no evidence, for which no viral load exists in their body. People with normal vitamin D levels overcome the infection and gain immunity.

No one can vaccinate their way out of a vitamin D deficiency. If vitamin D deficiency was adequately addressed, then the demand for vaccines would be nil. The science of vitamin D is often ignored because vaccines need to be profited from and worshiped as the end-all, holy grail of science. Anything else that is more helpful to the body is suppressed and censored to coerce submission to a false savior (vaccines) that carries their own set of risks. There’s no vitamin D mandate, no vitamin D passport system, and no distribution of vitamin D across the country, even though clinical and hospital settings are having tremendous success treating deficiencies and helping patients recover from infection.

- Fair Use -

Reply
Arthur
Posts: 3595
Registered
(@enrapturedwithchrist)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

I keep telling my family and friends about Vitamin D but they won’t believe me.

I take 5,000 International Units a day. At least in Winter when the sun is quite weak up here in Canada.

Reply
Arthur
Posts: 3595
Registered
(@enrapturedwithchrist)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Well, we all knew this was coming. Not a surprise at all.

People who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus can travel safely in the U.S. without getting tested or self-quarantining, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said Friday.

However, travelers should still continue to wear masks, practice social distancing and wash their hands, whether they are fully vaccinated or not, according to the agency.

The CDC updated its travel guidance on Friday, saying: "Fully vaccinated travelers are less likely to get and spread COVID-19." The agency did say that if a destination requires testing, fully vaccinated travelers would still need to adhere to the destination's requirements.

https://www.foxnews.com/travel/cdc-fully-vaccinated-people-travel-low-risk

Of course, we know this is complete nonsense but they are slowly turning up the pressure to get everyone to take part in this medical fraud.

Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA

By Aaron Siri  Statlaw.com. Feb 23, 2021

 

Ever since the Food and Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization for two new vaccines, employers, schools, and other organizations are grappling with whether to require Covid-19 vaccination.

While organizations are certainly free to encourage their employees, students, and other members to be vaccinated, federal law provides that, at least until the vaccine is licensed, individuals must have the option to accept or decline to be vaccinated.

Knowing what an organization can or cannot do with respect to Covid-19 vaccines can help them keep their employees, students, and members safe and also save the them from costly and time-consuming litigation.

Much remains unknown about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine

Even though the FDA granted emergency use authorizations for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines in December 2020, the clinical trials the FDA will rely upon to ultimately decide whether to license these vaccines are still underway and are designed to last for approximately two years to collect adequate data to establish if these vaccines are safe and effective enough for the FDA to license.

The abbreviated timelines for the emergency use applications and authorizations means there is much the FDA does not know about these products even as it authorizes them for emergency use, including their effectiveness against asymptomatic infection, death, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease.

Given the uncertainty about the two vaccines, their EUAs are explicit that each is “an investigational vaccine not licensed for any indication” and require that all “promotional material relating to the Covid-19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously … state that this product has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA”.

EUAs are clear: Getting these vaccines is voluntary

The same section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that authorizes the FDA to grant emergency use authorization also requires the secretary of Health and Human Services to “ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed … of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”

Likewise, the FDA’s guidance on emergency use authorization of medical products requires the FDA to “ensure that recipients are informed to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances … That they have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product …”

In the same vein, when Dr. Amanda Cohn, the executive secretary of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, was asked if Covid-19 vaccination can be required, she responded that under an EUA, “vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandatory.” Cohn later affirmed that this prohibition on requiring the vaccines applies to organizations, including hospitals.

The EUAs for both the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines require facts sheets to be given to vaccination providers and recipients. These fact sheets make clear that getting the vaccine is optional. For example, the one for recipients states that, “It is your choice to receive or not receive the Covid-19 Vaccine,” and if “you decide to not receive it, it will not change your standard of medical care.”

What this means in practice

When the FDA grants emergency use authorization for a vaccine, many questions about the product cannot be answered. Given the open questions, when Congress granted the authority to issue EUAs, it chose to require that every individual should be allowed to decide for himself or herself whether or not to receive an EUA product. The FDA and CDC apparently consider this fundamental requirement of choice important enough that even during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic they reinforced that policy decision when issuing their guidance related to the Covid-19 vaccines.

This means that an organization will likely be at odds with federal law if it requires its employees, students or other members to get a Covid-19 vaccine that is being distributed under emergency use authorization.

State law often prohibits retaliating against an employee for refusing to participate in a violation of federal law. Organizations that require Covid-19 vaccination in violation of federal law may face lawsuits under these state laws not only to block the policy but also for damages and attorneys’ fees. Such potentially costly lawsuits can be avoided by refraining from adopting policies that require vaccination or penalize members for choosing not to be vaccinated.

Organizations are free to encourage vaccinations through internal communications, through educational events, and through other measures to urge employees to be vaccinated. They can take these measures so long as: (1) they are not viewed as coercive, (2) the organization makes clear the decision regarding whether to receive the vaccine is voluntary, and (3) the measures comply with the requirements in the EUAs and the related regulations for these products.

People across the world have had their lives upended during the last year. The urgency to return to normalcy is felt deeply by many. As decision-makers at organizations decide on their Covid-19 vaccination policy, they should be careful to not let this passion lead the organization to run afoul of the law.

Aaron Siri is the managing partner at Siri & Glimstad LLP, a complex civil litigation firm with its principal office in New York City. This article is not intended to provide legal advice but to offer broad and general information about the law.

- Fair Use -

Reply
Arthur
Posts: 3595
Registered
(@enrapturedwithchrist)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago

Mandatory facemasks while swimming in the ocean???

More stupidity designed to make us angry. This is so incredibly stupid, it has to be on purpose. :stinkerbell:

https://mobile.twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1378663794474377217

Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

:mdrmdr:   You wonder if the majority of the people will ever finally get so fed up and say ENOUGH already and refuse to wear a mask?

We knew this mask was in the works ... no excuses now for removal if you plan on drinking a beverage ...

Reply
Posts: 436
Registered
(@gratefulforgrace)
Reputable Member
Joined: 6 years ago

geri- great article...can you post the exact link?  this was part of what i've said to family and thought for myself...it's very different to take an EUA medication when you are personally in a medical emergency and believe the potential benefits out way the risks than to to take an EUA "vaccine" while healthy...i appreciate the reminder that EUA means it's currently still a choice not a requirement...people are volunteering to continue the trial by taking it in order for them to obtain data to decide whether or not to give it full normal approval and then they can start determining if they think it's necessary to require it for public schools and medical personnel as they have done in the past with other vaccines...

i was so happy at first to know it was just EUA - so relieved that medical care personnel even wouldn't be required so i was sure my parents in that field wouldn't take it- at least until it was fully FDA approved, so there'd be time to make better informed decisions etc. too...but who knew they would choose to right away and so would at least 2 other of my close family members!

frustrating...they did a great job scaring some, convincing of the safety and importance and need to others, bribing still others with promotions etc...implying you are saving humanity with your sacrifice of a harmless shot...etc. etc...

Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Yeah the nerve of them trying to scare everyone into getting the vaxx when it hasn’t even been approved by the FDA.  Its good to know our rights and we still have options.  I saw the article posted over on the unsealed.org ... from Mike (the moderator).  He’s been bringing it lately with some good stuff.  Its hard for me to back track and find his original post but I googled the title and this is the source link he did use ...

 

Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring ... https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/federal-law-prohibits-employers-and-others-from-requiring-vaccination-with-a-covid-19-vaccine-distributed-under-an-eua/
Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19vaccine distributed under an EUA. By Aaron Siri Feb. 23, 2021.

Reply
Posts: 436
Registered
(@gratefulforgrace)
Reputable Member
Joined: 6 years ago

thank you, Geri!

it's a wild ride in the world these days...so ready to be snatched away outta harms way and into Heaven with our wonderful Savior!!

Reply
Yohanan
Posts: 3926
Moderator
Topic starter
(@yohanan)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Time to givee our scrolling hand a break. Continue here.

Reply
Page 7 / 7
Share: