Kolleen, in this situation, I am going to remain quiet. TR, I agree sometimes silence is golden. God has to speak to people's hearts. Someone told me once that it is useless to talk to people, they have a certain mind set and they won't change their minds regardless of how you to try to reason with them. Not everyone is like that but sometimes you can tell if they are. This friend has been talking about the shots before they were even on the market... that a very effective vax is in the works to get us out of the situation. I told him once I am worried about making an appointment to do the driving test, what if they needed people to be vaxed to take it. He said and he sounded like he was trying to comfort me: please don't worry about the vax, in very rare situations people are getting injured. It is very rare that someone reacts.................. When he said that, I got confused as to whether he is right and the injuries are rare cases. I think he has set his mind on believing this is to help us and I don't need confusion. I am going to pray for him only. As for the job, I will wait until I got other employment and tell him that I have another job now. Coming soon … :wacko: Forget Booster shots and get ready for the Universal Pan Coronavirus vaccine that will be mandatory and injected inside you on a yearly basis NTEB There’s a new kind of vaccine on the horizon — and it could help target all coronaviruses, not just Covid-19. Get ready to receive the yearly Universal Pan Coronavirus vaccine, coming soon and mandatory! We have been telling you for more than 2 years now that the vaccine was going to be global, and now that they have managed to convince the whole world that people cannot be safe without the government injection, time to roll out the Universal Pan Coronavirus Vaccine, mandatory and administered on a yearly basis if you want to keep your Immunity Passport activated. CEO of Moderna and Anthony Fauci are both telling you it’s coming, but we told you that in 2019. “Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.” Habakkuk 1:5 So all the cards are on the table, you know what they’re up to and you know what’s coming. You thought that if you agreed to take the 2 shot, they would leave you alone. They didn’t. You thought that if you agreed to get boosted they would leave you alone, and they didn’t. Whatever is in those shots is so important to the New World Order that they are more than willing to lie, cheat, steal, threaten, bribe and entice you to take them, and that’s exactly why I don’t want them. This is not medicine, it’s not science, it’s religion, and it’s time you figured that out. - Fair Use - Australian Media Pushes To Inject Pets With The Covid Vaccine :negative: Winepressnews.com Comment section: They don't want animals alive either then? Maybe they are worried people will eat them in the coming famine of the third Horseman. Who knows what evil plans lurk in their wicked hearts. They want to see how much people will comply to all their demands. - Fair Use - Geri, does the Universal Pan Coronavirus vaccine come with free Wi-Fi? :calvin Hmmm...maybe if pets get the vaxxx, they will become rabid and attack people? Revelation 6:8 New King James Version 8 So I looked, and behold, a pale horse. And the name of him who sat on it was Death, and Hades followed with him. And power was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to kill with sword, with hunger, with death, and by the beasts of the earth. Still pondering the sinister “wish” for the Aussies to push the vax on people’s pets. When Dodger as sick and the vet hospital failed to find what was wrong and when I was making an appointment with his local vet to be seen I said to the appointment scheduler … could he have covid?? She laughed and said no … it’s impossible for dogs and cats to get covid. So if that is the case … why is the Australians pushing this? Could it be to disarm their people even more since pets, especially dogs, will protect their owner against evil people who try to harm them or try to arrest them or take them to a covid camp? I “think” this just proves these evil leaders wish we were gone as well as our pets and the Lord is going to give them their wish by snatching both us and our fur babies out of here SOON! Hosea 4:3 “Therefore shall the land mourn, and every one that dwelleth therein shall languish, with the beasts of the field, and with the fowls of heaven; yea, the fishes of the sea also shall be taken away.” It could be that people are so calloused these days that they don't bat an eye when 85 year old grannie dies. However, if cute little Fido were to die? It could be a way to bring animal lovers/couples with no children but have pets on board with overthrowing the old world order if they see their pets die a horrible death. They want us to rebel and they don't care if they have to sacrifice a huge number of innocent animals/babies/children/people to do it. The CDC thinks covid is transmissible by animals though they think the likelihood is low: Per the CDC: What You Need to Know Risk of animals spreading SARS-CoV-2 to people Some coronaviruses that infect animals can be spread to people and then spread between people, but this is rare. This is what happened with SARS-CoV-2, which likely originated in bats. Risk of people spreading SARS-CoV-2 to animals Companion animals, including pet cats, dogs, and ferrets. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/animals.html FAIR USE Preying on the emotional attachment of pets they hope to entice owners to get vaxxed as well! TR We are watching you ... hmm.... Fair use for educational purposes: COMMENTARY BY This week, we revealed that an obscure federal agency plans to keep lists of the “personal religious information” employees who had religious objections to the federal employee vaccine mandate. As it turns out, the little-known Pre-trial Services Agency for the District of Columbia isn’t the only federal agency involved. As we feared, a whole-of-government effort looks to be underway. A little digging at the Federal Register revealed that there are at least 19 total federal agencies—including five cabinet level agencies—that have created or proposed to create these tracking lists for religious-exemption requests from their employees. The list includes the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of the Treasury, to name only a few. As the nation’s largest employer, with over four million civilian and military employees, the federal government has received tens of thousands of religious exemption requests. It now appears that an increasing number of federal agencies are keeping and preserving those individuals’ names, religious information, personally identifying information, and other data stored in lists across multiple government agencies. Why? The earliest set of proposals appears to have been rolled out in October of last year, during the start of the holiday season in a possible effort to ensure very little attention was paid to a coordinated data collection move. Many of the announcements have clocked only a few page views. Almost none attracted any public comments. Most permitted only a 30-day window for submitting objections. All announcements were issued within a few weeks of one another. The timing alone raises questions. The Pre-trial Services Agency in D.C. was only the most recent iteration of a disturbing trend—the Biden administration is creating lists that can all communicate with one another on which individuals have sought religious exemptions from the federal employee vaccine mandate or other religious accommodations within the scope of their employment by the government. Several of the notices, but not all, indicate that they are being issued to implement Biden’s COVID-19 executive order on federal government employees. The rest have proffered the Privacy Act of 1974—which establishes a code of information practices that governs the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of information about individuals stored by federal agencies—as their justification for the creation of a new list. The agencies plan to collect religious affiliation, the reasons and support given for religious accommodation requests, names, contact information, date of birth, aliases, home address, contact information, and other identifying information. These lists will be shared between federal agencies. The notices do not explain how long they plan on storing this data, why they need to share it between agencies, or why they need to keep it beyond the decision to grant or deny an employee’s religious accommodation request. The Federal Register announcements raised eyebrows for Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt. In his public comment to the Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg stating strenuous opposition to the list creation, he noted: On November 18, at the direction of the Biden administration, four federal agencies simultaneously announced that those who exercise their legal right to seek a health or religious waiver from a vaccine mandate would be tracked in federal databases. Rather than give the public ample time to weigh in on the advisability or legality of collecting such personal information, the Department of Transportation’s database in particular became effective on the day it was published… The chilling effect on a citizens’ exercise of religion due to the creation of this Database is alarming… the federal government decrees that a citizen who seeks a medical exemption or a waiver based on a sincerely held religious belief has automatically consented to being entered in the Database. To put it plainly, invoking the legal right to exercise one’s religious faith risks simultaneously waiving that legal right. The day we broke the story on the Pre-trial Services Agency announcement in the federal register, the notice had 16 views. As of the publication of this story, it now has more than 13,000.
The Bible says the devil loves to kill.
The risk of animals spreading SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, to people is low.
The virus can spread from people to animals during close contact.
More studies are needed to understand if and how different animals could be affected by COVID-19.
People with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 should avoid contact with animals, including pets, livestock, and wildlife.
Based on the available information to date, the risk of animals spreading COVID-19 to people is considered to be low.
At this time, there is no evidence that animals play a significant role in spreading SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, to people. More studies are needed to understand if and how different animals could be affected by SARS-CoV-2.
People can spread SARS-CoV-2 to animals, especially during close contact.
Reports of animals infected with SARS-CoV-2 have been documented around the world. Most of these animals became infected after contact with people with COVID-19, including owners, caretakers, or others who were in close contact. We don’t yet know all of the animals that can get infected. Animals reported infected include:
Animals in zoos and sanctuaries, including several types of big cats, otters, non-human primates, a binturong, a coatimundi, a fishing cat, and hyenas.
Mink on mink farms.
Wild white-tailed deer in several U.S. states.
Sarah Parshall Perry@SarahPPerry
