In September, a study was published that examined the health records of the 8.4 million residents of Seoul, South Korea. It found that overall, there was a 27% increased risk of developing cancer within one year of covid vaccination. The difference between types of “vaccine” was significant: a 20% increased risk of cancer after mRNA injections, and a 50% increased risk after adenovirus vector injections (such as AstraZeneca). On 26 September 2025, a study entitled ‘1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-based cohort study in South Korea’ was published in the journal Biomarker Research. It examined the health records of the 8.4 million residents of Seoul, South Korea, enrolled in the National Health Insurance Scheme and compared the rate of cancer incidence for covid vaccinated people to unvaccinated people. In this article, we analyse the results in detail and draw conclusions that are vital for public policy formation. The study compared the cancer incidence among people who had received at least two covid vaccine doses between 2021 and 2023 with the cancer outcomes of unvaccinated people. It specifically compared the cancer outcomes of the vaccinated for the 12 months immediately following the completion of their vaccine course with the cancer records of the unvaccinated for the 12 months of 2022. There was a total of 600,000 people who were unvaccinated (8%) of the Seoul population. The two groups were carefully matched by age, gender, insurance status and comorbidities in order to exclude confounding factors. The key findings of this huge study were as follows: • As a whole, there was a 27% increased risk of developing cancer within one year of covid vaccination relative to the unvaccinated. This risk was not evenly spread among cancer types and vaccination types. • There was a 35% increased relative risk of thyroid cancer, 21% for gastric cancer, 28% for colorectal cancer, 53% for lung cancer, 20% for breast cancer and 69% for prostate cancer. • The risk for all cancers was 20% if you received mRNA injections and 50% if you received adenovirus vector injections. Only adenovirus vaccines increased the risk of gastric cancer and prostate cancer. Only mRNA vaccines increased the risk of breast cancer. An increased risk of the other statistically significant cancer types (thyroid, lung, and colorectal) held true for both types of vaccines. • People who received a Pfizer mRNA booster had an even greater risk of gastric cancer than those who only had two injections. In addition, they had a clinically significant risk of developing pancreatic cancer, a finding similar to results found in Japanese health data. • Although cancer is the second highest cause of mortality, covid vaccination is also known to be associated with increased incidence of some types of heart disease, neurological illness, kidney disease and mental illness. Therefore, the actual risk of some types of serious illness following covid vaccination is much higher than the cancer risk alone. Although the study found a statistically significant association between covid vaccination and increased cancer risk relative to the unvaccinated, its results have been largely ignored by corporate media or, in some cases, dismissed or minimised. The idea that covid vaccines are a biotechnology miracle has been deeply entrenched in the public psyche through government pronouncements and paid media promotion. Moreover, research scientists are heavily invested in the future of biotechnology research. This bias and the associated preconceptions about safety and effectiveness of biotechnology are proving very hard to shake, even by a study of this magnitude and statistical certainty. [More at the link.] https://expose-news.com/2025/11/17/increase-in-risk-of-cancer-after-covid-vaccination/ The UK Health Security Agency (“UKHSA”) has been accused of a “cover-up” for refusing to publish data that could potentially link the covid “vaccine” to excess deaths, citing concerns that releasing the data would lead to distress or anger among bereaved relatives if a link were to be discovered. “Public health officials also argued that publishing the data risked damaging the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of people who died,” The Telegraph said. Ben Kingsley, the legal director of UsForThem, described the UKHSA’s handling of the case as “revealing a desperation that this data should not, in any form, see the light of day.” He also criticised the UKHSA’s argument that the public could feel distressed or angry if patterns or correlations were to be identified, saying it reveals a “patronising mindset”... https://expose-news.com/2025/11/17/uk-public-health-watchdog-refuses/ “Public health officials also argued that publishing the data risked damaging the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of people who died,” The Telegraph said. oh yes, they don't want to publish the findings so as not to damage the well-being and mental health of families and friends of people who died. these people are so caring, so ethical and compassionate. they are all heart! https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-11-25-doctors-kill-more-people-than-ten-holocausts.html can't help highlighting this excerpt: It's a fact: According to the World Health Organization, doctors around the world have killed more than 60 million people over the last 20 years. Not all of them were on purpose, of course, but many were caused by doctors' overall ignorance about health, brainwashing by pharmaceutical companies and a stubborn unwillingness (tied with arrogance) to learn about the true causes of health and wellness. Instead, they mostly just push prescription drugs, chemotherapy, surgery and vaccine injury denialism, often while berating their patients for daring the learn anything on their own. This high-stakes research, aimed at developing mRNA vaccines and analyzing transmission in livestock, is raising red flags among experts who warn of catastrophic lab leaks that could unleash the disease on U.S. soil, devastating agriculture and public health. The program involves multiple facilities, including the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service in Manhattan, Kansas (tied to the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, formerly on Plum Island), UC Davis in California, and Texas Tech in Lubbock, Texas, according to research from the White Coat Waste project, first reported by The Highwire. “The White Coat Waste Project uncovered 10 existing USDA contracts to work on mRNA vaccines, including one that is studying Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF), a highly pathogenic tick-borne disease with a 10-40% case fatality rate,” The Highwire reports. Justin Goodman, Senior Vice President for Advocacy and Public Policy at the White Coat Waste Project (WCWP), called it a “recipe for disaster,” telling the outlet, “Recklessly importing deadly exotic diseases like African swine flu and other hemorrhagic fevers to the U.S.—where they have never been found—for dangerous animal experiments that can leak and cause outbreaks in animals and people is a recipe for disaster.” https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/exposed-us-labs-breeding-deadly-foreign-ticks-bid/ Millions of Americans across the country were told during the pandemic to offer up their arms for the COVID-19 vaccines — the first-ever mRNA vaccines approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — if they wanted to keep their jobs, eat in public, stay in school, or visit their loved ones. Government officials, the establishment media, and pharmaceutical representatives claimed that the vaccines were "safe and effective." Those who dared to suggest otherwise about the experimental drugs that were making liability-shielded vaccine manufacturers record profits were often attacked and censored. Months after the Department of Health and Human Services concluded that "mRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses," the Food and Drug Administration admitted in an internal letter that the COVID-19 vaccines killed numerous children. In the email, which was reviewed by multiple publications and shared online by the Washington Post, Prasad indicated that the OBPV [FDA Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance] performed an analysis of 96 deaths between 2021 and 2024 and concluded "that no fewer than 10 are related. If anything, this represents conservative coding, where vaccines are exculpated rather than indicated in cases of ambiguity. The real number is higher." "That number is certainly an underestimate due to underreporting, and inherent bias in attribution," wrote Prasad. "This safety signal has far-reaching implications for Americans, the U.S. pandemic response, and the agency itself." "For the first time, the U.S. FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children," continued Prasad... "Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced, at the behest of the Biden administration, via school and work mandates, to receive a vaccine that could result in death. In many cases, such mandates were harmful." FDA commissioner Dr. Marty Makary said...that his agency would no longer "rubber-stamp things with no data," adding that such a "mockery of science" was alternatively "the M.O. in the Biden administration with the eternal COVID booster approvals for young, healthy kids." It is by the Holy Spirit and the grace of God that I did not take any covid vaccines or boosters. A federal advisory committee voted on Friday to end the universal hepatitis B vaccine recommendation for newborn babies – a decision which will now go to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director for final approval. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the CDC’s vaccine advisers, determined in an 8-3 vote to narrow the recommendation. Instead of recommending the shot for all newborn babies, the advisory board is opting to recommend it only for newborns whose mothers test positive for the virus. “Women whose hepatitis B status is negative or unknown should talk with their doctors about vaccination, the recommendation says,” according to NPR. “If you are a baby that was born to a mother that was tested negative for Hep B, you need to realize, as a parent, that your risk of infection throughout your early stage of life and probably throughout most of your childhood, is extremely low to the extent that it’s even hard to quantify how low. It is, it’s probably one in several millions [sic],” Professor Retsef Levi – a member of the ACIP – said in a clip shared by the CDC. President Donald Trump directed the U.S childhood vaccine schedule to be aligned with peer nations if a review by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention finds theirs are superior to the current U.S. schedule. Trump issued a memorandum on Friday directing HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy and acting CDC Director Jim O’Neil to conduct a review of peer nations. For instance, Germany recommends 15 vaccines, Japan recommends 14, and Denmark offers 10, nearly half of the U.S. schedule. Trump on Friday also applauded a federal advisory committee’s move to end the hepatitis B vaccine recommendation for newborns, as Breitbart News reported. "The American Childhood Vaccine Schedule long required 72 ‘jabs,’ for perfectly healthy babies, far more than any other Country in the World, and far more than is necessary,” he added.South Korean study finds a 27% increase in risk of developing cancer within one year after covid vaccination:
UK public health watchdog refuses to release covid vaccine data as it would anger the public if a link to harms were discovered:
EXPOSED: US Labs Breeding Deadly Foreign Ticks in Bid for mRNA Vaccines:
U.S. government-funded labs are actively breeding colonies of exotic Hyalomma ticks imported from Africa to study Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF), a brutal tick-borne virus with a 30% mortality rate that’s never been detected in America.
Federal Vaccine Advisory Committee Votes to End Universal Hepatitis B Vaccine Recommendation for Babies:
Memo: Trump Wants U.S. Child Vaccine Schedules to Look More Like Japan and Europe’s: