RAPTURE CHAT v.3 He...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

RAPTURE CHAT v.3 Here

58 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
859 Views
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Interestingly King Charles the 1st died of beheading

The execution of Charles I by beheading occurred on Tuesday, 30 January 1649 outside the Banqueting House on Whitehall. The execution was the culmination of political and military conflicts between the royalists and the parliamentarians in England during the English Civil War, leading to the capture and trial of Charles I, the King of England, Scotland, and Ireland. On Saturday 27 January 1649, the parliamentarian High Court of Justice had declared Charles guilty of attempting to "uphold in himself an unlimited and tyrannical power to rule according to his will, and to overthrow the rights and liberties of the people" and he was sentenced to death by beheading.

 

His son …
King Charles the 2nd didn’t die of beheading instead it is believe from mercury poisoning …. The suddenness of his illness and death led to suspicion of poison in the minds of many, including one of the royal doctors; however, a more modern medical analysis has held that the symptoms of his final illness are similar to those of uraemia (a clinical syndrome due to kidney dysfunction). Charles had a laboratory among his many interests, where prior to his illness he had been experimenting with mercury. Mercuric poisoning can produce irreversible kidney damage; but the case for this being a cause of his death is unproven. In the days between his collapse and his death, Charles endured a variety of torturous treatments including bloodletting, purging and cupping in hopes of effecting a recovery, which may have exacerbated his uraemia through dehydration instead of helping alleviate it.

Wikipedia

- Fair Use -

 

 

But perhaps “the deadly wound healed” is symbolic of being compared to the first King Charles with “upholding himself an unlimited and tyrannical power to rule according to his will, and to overthrow the rights and liberties of the people?” :unsure:

Reply
churchgal
Posts: 763
Registered
(@churchgal)
Prominent Member
Joined: 6 years ago

With all the things converging, I feel strongly that we are in the time frame.....days to weeks and more likely spring than fall. I used to always favor ascension day or pentecost rapture....but scripture also says "on a day that you think not".....so maybe not one of those days but just a random day near them. I am hopeful for today still and tomorrow and the next day.....every day til He comes :amen:

Reply
Terry
Posts: 984
Registered
(@terry)
Noble Member
Joined: 2 years ago

This morning, as part of the process of choosing my next project, I thought of making things for the church to give out at Christmas.  Then I thought, none of us will be here at Christmas.

Reply
Yohanan
Posts: 3926
Moderator
Topic starter
(@yohanan)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

I don’t think posting a photo would be a problem. It’s all just speculation.

Reply
Terry
Posts: 984
Registered
(@terry)
Noble Member
Joined: 2 years ago

Speculation, of course.  Surely no one is trying to accuse or condemn anyone, just having a bit of fun noticing intriguing connections.  By the way, if we go May 5 and he goes with us, what happens to the all coronation plans?  That commotion might be rather humorous as well.

Reply
Paul R
Posts: 343
Registered
(@paulr)
Prominent Member
Joined: 2 years ago

I’m a little hesitant to post the following information, simply because I might be unnecessarily belaboring the point. Also, it could possibly be a red herring, as it were, and of no consequence whatsoever.

In 1981 I was a young man in a world that was caught up in the hype of an impending royal wedding and nobody could ignore the excitement and pomp and ceremony that was about to unfold when the betrothed Charles (32) and Diana (20) would make their wedding vows in St Paul’s Cathedral in London.

It was during this time that I read a newspaper interview with the couple shortly after they famously got engaged. One of the questions was if they shared any common interests. One of them said they were both intrigued by occultism and that they had even attended some meetings of the Church of Wicca in England.

Naturally, I was shocked! At the time I had never heard of the Church of Wicca, so I looked it up. This morning I tried to find that interview online to prove it, but couldn’t find it. Of course, in 1981 press articles weren’t yet digital, so I’d probably need to find the hard copy. I remember it very clearly though, and told quite a few people about it – it’s not something you can confuse or forget, especially not about someone destined to become Head of the Church of England and “Defender of the Faith”.

To make a short story even longer, as I was digging on the internet to find this interview, I watched a video interview with the couple (pre-wedding). One of the questions were: “Do you love each other?”

Diana immediately said: “Yes, of course!”

Charles followed by saying: “Yes, yes, whatever love is.” :unsure:

Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Oh I believe it.  We’ve been lied to on so many levels.

Princess Diana wanted to call off the marriage ceremony but the Queen said its too late .. all the invitations have been given out and their names/images and date of the wedding were on all the souvenirs.  So she had to go on with the wedding and put on a pretend happy face.

 

Here Prince William wears the Goats Head Patch … part of the Royal Air Force Squadron mascot symbol.

E092948D-FA8E-4ED6-9CEA-34A6DB05B9E4

I remember seeing this on a youtube … Prince William & Harry and Kate were on the set of Harry Potter promoting magic on the Today Show.

C7EB60D7-366E-4CC2-AC63-BAB47AA66511

- Fair Use -

Reply
Yohanan
Posts: 3926
Moderator
Topic starter
(@yohanan)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Continue here.

Reply
Page 6 / 6
Share: