NEWS: POLITICAL v.3
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

NEWS: POLITICAL v.3

59 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
1,197 Views
Patricia N.
Posts: 4664
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Build Back Broke: Biden’s Multi-Trillion Dollar Federal “Stimulus” Package Cost Taxpayers $855,000 Per Job Saved, Made “Near-ZERO Impact on National Income and Economic Growth”:

Well, now that the numbers have had time to be analyzed, the results of Biden’s disastrous “stimulus package” are shaping up to be even worse than originally thought. According to a new National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) study, the American Rescue Plan cost the taxpayers a whopping $855,000 per every year of employment it saved. Unbelievably, the cost to preserve each job amounts to, at minimum, 8-10x the salary for each position.

Overall, the NBER study found that the package had a “near-zero impact on national income and economic growth.” There was little evidence, if any “at all” that the 1.9 trillion stimulus injection, which was the largest in history, had even a “moderate” effect on the “broader economy,” according to researchers.

In other words, no other president has spent as much as Biden in one go and come up with as little as he has to show for it.

If it wasn’t clear already with the state of the economy under Biden, the new study proves definitively that the American Rescue Plan was nothing more than a boat anchor disguised as a life preserver.

As the NBER study shows, $1.9 trillion had a “statistically indistinguishable from zero” benefit for American citizens. Where did all of the money go?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/build-back-broke-bidens-multi-trillion-dollar-federal-stimulus-package-cost-taxpayers-855000-per-job-saved-made-near-zero-impact-national-income-economic-growth/

 

 

Reply
Patricia N.
Posts: 4664
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Far-Left Melts Down Over Supreme Court Ruling on Religious Schools:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday released its ruling on a Maine case related to using government vouchers for religious schools.  The court ruled that Maine could not prohibit parents from using vouchers to pay for religious schools.

“This decision recognizes that religious institutions should have equal access to government programs without sacrificing their religious identity and ability to remain true to their mission,” Eric Baxter, Vice President & Senior Counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty said.

Liberals are upset about the ruling and claim it infringes on the division between church and state.

Tuesday was a win for religious freedom.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/far-left-melts-supreme-court-ruling-religious-schools/

Reply
Patricia N.
Posts: 4664
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Pollster deflates Dem hope that Jan. 6 hearings will persuade voters: 'Not doing the damage' to Republican Party that Dems wanted:

"You should have had counter-testimony, you should have had people challenging those witnesses," Luntz said. "But the conclusion that some people have come to is that this is simply the third attempt to impeach Donald Trump."

Second, voters simply care about more important issues.

"Make no mistake: This will have an impact on [Trump's] candidacy should he run," Luntz said. "But also make no mistake: Voters care much more about crime, immigration, and of course inflation.

A recent analysis by the Brookings Institute discovered that most Republican candidates running for election this year are not discussing Jan. 6 or the 2020 presidential election.

While Democrats focus on Jan. 6, gun control, and abortion, Republicans are focusing their campaign messaging on issues that voters care about most: inflation, border security, and crime.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/frank-luntz-voter-impact-jan-6-hearings

Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Starts @ 1:40

- Fair Use -

Reply
Geri9
Posts: 4883
Registered
(@geri9)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 4 years ago

Starts @ 1:26

- Fair Use -

Reply
James Callaway
Posts: 46
Registered
(@eccehomo)
Trusted Member
Joined: 4 years ago

The WEF plans are out in the open. Meat has a large carbon footprint. It is no accident they are destroying our meat supply. Their alternative is crickets and mealworms which have a lower carbon footprint.

The more vegan you are the more free you will be in their system. Check this out:

https://vulcanpost.com/663092/ento-malaysia-edible-cricket-salted-egg/

These are just two examples of their plans. The WEF wants total control over every detail of our lives. A tyranny on steroids. I pray Jesus returns and calls us home this year. I am sick at heart at all the evil we have been witnessing.

God Bless.

 

 

 

 

 

Reply
Patricia N.
Posts: 4664
Registered
(@patrician)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Supreme Court Strikes Down New York’s Proper Cause Requirement for Concealed Carry:

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled 6-3 on June 23 that New York’s proper cause requirement for concealed carry permit issuance is unconstitutional.

New York State Rifle and Pistol Association  (NYSRPA) v. Bruen centered on denials for permits under New York’s concealed carry permitting law. The NYSRPA filed suit claiming that one of its members was eligible for a permit but was denied because of New York’s requirement that concealed carry applicants prove why they need to carry a gun.

The case ultimately dealt with the scope of the Second Amendment — whether the right to keep and bear arms applies only in the home or outside the home as well.

When SCOTUS granted cert in the case the NYSRPA responded:  This case challenges New York’s requirement that applicants demonstrate “proper cause” to carry a firearm. New York regularly uses this requirement to deny applicants the right to carry a firearm outside of their homes. The NRA believes that law-abiding citizens should not be required to prove they are in peril to receive the government’s permission to exercise this constitutionally protected right.

NRA-ILA director Jason Ouimet also commented on the suit after the Supreme Court agreed to hear it: Under current New York law, a law-abiding resident becomes a felon the moment he or she steps outside their home with their firearm. This is a clear infringement of the Second Amendment.  The NRA is grateful that the Supreme Court is tackling this critical issue. We are proud to be a part of this case, and we look forward to a future in which law-abiding Americans everywhere have the fundamental right to self-defense the way the Constitution intended.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/23/supreme-court-strikes-down-new-yorks-proper-cause-requirement-concealed-carry/

Reply
churchgal
Posts: 767
Registered
(@churchgal)
Prominent Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Uh-huh.....but if one is rich they can "buy" additional limits to "offset" their carbon footprint....which turns this whole hypocritical thing into the old system of royalty and peasants. They won't even bat an eye at starving millions of people on the planet it their ridiculous effort to combat "climate change".

Come Lord Jesus :prayer-hands:

Reply
KolleenWStone
Posts: 1600
Moderator
(@kolleenwhitestone)
Noble Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Related to James post, no we're not under the Law, but still something to consider...

Genesis 1:26
Then God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.

Leviticus 11:20-23
All winged insects that go on all fours are detestable to you. Yet among the winged insects that go on all fours you may eat those that have jointed legs above their feet, with which to hop on the ground. Of them you may eat: the locust of any kind, the bald locust of any kind, the cricket of any kind, and the grasshopper of any kind. But all other winged insects that have four feet are detestable to you.

Deuteronomy 14:19
And all winged insects are unclean for you; they shall not be eaten.

Whatever crawls on its belly, whatever goes on all fours, or whatever has many feet among all creeping things that creep on the earth these you shall not eat, for they are an abomination. Lev 11

Genesis 1:29-31
And God said, Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food. And it was so.

An aside....

13 Common Foods That Could Secretly Contain Insects
Brooke Nelson Updated: May 19, 2022
https://www.rd.com/list/foods-secretly-contain-insects/

 

Reply
Perhaps Today
Posts: 785
Registered
(@perhapstoday)
Noble Member
Joined: 6 years ago

Roe vs Wade overturned !!!!  I am afraid it is too little too late. See you in the air soon.

Reply
Page 5 / 6
Share: