Notifications
Clear all

2 witnesses

11 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
2,952 Views
Taureauchien
Posts: 47
Registered
Topic starter
(@taureauchien)
Trusted Member
Joined: 7 years ago
[#3428]

Does the bible say that the 2 witnesses do not appear until at least the start of the trib?

Or could they show up just prior? ..... like as in our week warning before God shuts the ark door


10 Replies
Taureauchien
Posts: 47
Registered
Topic starter
(@taureauchien)
Trusted Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Anyone?


Reply
AmyVG
Posts: 2645
Registered
(@metroames)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 7 years ago

I believe they show up right before the middle of the Tribulation.  I explain why in my commentary on Revelation 11:

http://trackingbibleprophecy.org/revelation11A.php#3-6


Reply
Taureauchien
Posts: 47
Registered
Topic starter
(@taureauchien)
Trusted Member
Joined: 7 years ago

Interesting. I always thought they did first half and the 144000 did act 2.


Reply
MyWhiteStone
Posts: 1339
Registered
(@mywhitestone)
Noble Member
Joined: 7 years ago

I recalled a book by Heather Rivard, (who posts here occasionally), entitled In the Spotlight: Volume 1 -- Departure Desolation Delusion, and found the chapter entitled "Revealed in His Time."  Here is that chapter repeated, but for brevity here not repeating the Bible text but references instead.

This is taken from down a few paragraphs here, and just because some don't like wading. :negative:  "...our only other option is to accept that the ascension of the beast does not occur until the two witnesses will have finished their testimony. This activity will occur near the midpoint of the Week, and specifically during Trumpet 6. ..."

QUOTE

Lest one find it difficult to wrap their minds around some or all the ideas presented so far, the next set of verses from II Thessalonians 2 will substantiate them. While the following verses are often related to the rapture of the church, we will quickly find out they should not be. Rather, they relate to the same two events Paul already wrote about: the falling away and the revelation of the man of sin.

(2 Thessalonians 2:6)

From previous verses in the chapter, we have already learned the revelation of the man of sin is the Abomination of Desolation. We have also learned the wrath of God will be poured upon the desolate (desolator), or as verse 8 calls him, “that Wicked”. While we are heaping names upon him, we should probably not forget that verse 4 also calls him the son of perdition. That title is important in understanding the timing of the verses above. We find the same reference in Revelation 17.

(Revelation 17:1-3, Revelation 17:7-8)

These verses relate to Revelation 13.

(Revelation 13:1-7)

II Thessalonians 2’s son of perdition is Revelation 13 and 17’s beast. Even if we hadn’t already been told the revelation of the man of sin/son of perdition was defined as the Abomination of Desolation, we would still be able to link the revelation of the son of perdition/beast to the midpoint of the Week. ​There are several theories about the events of the midpoint of the Week regarding the deadly head wound and a false resurrection and a spirit inhabiting the body of the Antichrist. While we cannot say for sure exactly what will occur, we know something will occur to change the status quo. The first time we are introduced to the Antichrist as the beast is in Revelation 11 where the beast is seen ascending out of the bottomless pit and killing the two witnesses.

(Revelation 11:1-7)

How do we know the beast will not ascend out of the bottomless pit earlier? That he isn’t just waiting for the days of the witnesses to expire before he acts? Because we are told he doesn’t ascend until after their testimony has been finished. If another time was intended, the language could have been written much more vaguely. It could have said the beast “will ascend”, leaving it relevant to some point in the future but not limiting it to that specific point in time. However, “ascendeth” is written in the “present active participle - nominative singular neuter”[35] verb tense. In fact, the only occurrences of the Greek word “anabainon”[36] (ascendeth) are found in Revelation 11 and 13 relating to the beast coming up out of the bottomless pit, otherwise known as the sea. Why is the language important?

(The present active participle, like all present participles, is derived only from imperfective verbs, since it refers to an action that is currently taking place or which takes place repeatedly.[37])

We can eliminate the ascension of the beast from the bottomless pit as a repeated event. Thus, our only other option is to accept that the ascension of the beast does not occur until the two witnesses will have finished their testimony. This activity will occur near the midpoint of the Week, and specifically during Trumpet 6. It is for this reason we are told in Revelation 13 the beast will be given power to “continue” forty and two months, otherwise known as the second half of Daniel’s 70th Week. If he is “continuing”, it means he has ascended and been given power prior to that point. He simply will not yet have been revealed via the Abomination of Desolation.

Why would the beast wait to commit the Abomination of Desolation until a few days later? Why wouldn’t he just commit it after he overcomes and kills the two witnesses? Because his Abomination of Desolation is reactionary.

While Daniel 9:27 tells us the midpoint of the Week is characterized by the cessation of sacrifices and offerings as well as by the overspreading of abominations, Revelation shows us the midpoint of the Week is also characterized by the events of Trumpet 7.

(Revelation 10:7)

What is the mystery of God?

(1 Timothy 3:16)

How will it be finished at the midpoint of the Week?

(Ephesians 3:9, Revelation 14:6-7)

There will even be a great wonder placed in the heavens detailing all parts of the mystery of God and its revelation. Compare the following to I Timothy 3:16 and Revelation 14:6-7.

(Revelation 12:1-4)

What does this have to do with the Abomination of Desolation being reactionary? It’s the inference made by Jesus in Matthew 24 as well as by John in Revelation 12, for the flight of the remnant is shown immediately after the great wonder appears in heaven.

(Revelation 12:6)

When is the remnant told to flee?

(Matthew 24:15-22)

What does Matthew 24 say will immediately precede this flight?

(Matthew3 24:14)

Thus, we can infer the Abomination of Desolation is reactionary to the angel of Revelation 14’s finishing of the mystery of God. That mystery is finished when the angel reveals to the world its need to fear and worship God. So, of course, what does the beast do? He seeks the fear and worship for himself.

(2 Thessalonians 2:4)

This is the meaning of the son of perdition/desolator/man of sin/beast being revealed “in his time”.

(2 Thessalonians 2:6-8)

At this point, knowing the revelation of the man of sin occurs at the midpoint of the Week, we can also determine what is restraining him. Since many people equate the above verses to the rapture, they would say the Holy Spirit-indwelled church is restraining the Antichrist. However, since the rapture will have occurred 3.5 years prior to this point, that cannot be the case. What did Daniel 9:27 tell us will occur at the midpoint of the Week?

(Daniel 9:27)

II Thessalonians 2:7 tells us the mystery of iniquity, or lawlessness, is already at work. A mystery is something that has not yet been revealed. However, this lawlessness will no longer be a mystery when the man of sin (lawlessness) is revealed. What is the opposite of being lawless? Well, being lawful, of course. In Romans 7, Paul says the following:

(Romans 7:7)

Simply put, lawlessness is only defined by what the law says is wrong to do. In this case, lawlessness is revealed by the departure from the law – the cessation of the sacrifices and oblations – and by the Antichrist’s direct violation of the law – the proclamation of being above all that is called God. But doesn’t II Thessalonians 2:7 say that a “he” is restraining? Not exactly. Here is what the verse translates to from the original Greek.

[The indeed mystery now operating this iniquity only the restraining at present until out of the midst he might come.]

When people refer to the “restrainer” as a he, it is because the verb​“restrain”, or “katecho” in Greek, has a masculine gender.[48] It is, however, a verb, not a noun. This means it is a reference to the action and not to the person or thing performing the action. We should note, however, the noun “law”, or “nomos”[49] in Greek, also has a masculine gender. The Holy Spirit will not be restraining the Antichrist’s lawlessness. The presence of the Mosaic law will be. Just as the word “let” actually means “restrain”, the words “taken out of the way” also mean the opposite of how they sound. The Greek word “genētai” truly means “to come into being or to physically manifest”.[50] Thus, the verse should read that the mystery of lawlessness is being restrained until the physical revelation of the man of lawlessness. It is at that point lawlessness will no longer be hidden. Seems pretty simple, huh? If it really is that simple and the Antichrist’s breaking of the law at the midpoint of the Week will alert the world to his presence and person, why won’t more people understand what is going on and stand against him? The next verses in II Thessalonians 2 answer that for us.

UNQUOTE

 


Reply
Page 1 / 3
Share: